...
首页> 外文期刊>Chronobiology international >Differences in circadian phase and weekday/weekend sleep patterns in a sample of middle-aged morning types and evening types
【24h】

Differences in circadian phase and weekday/weekend sleep patterns in a sample of middle-aged morning types and evening types

机译:中年早晨类型和晚上类型的样​​本中昼夜节律和工作日/周末睡眠方式的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Factors contributing to sleep timing and sleep restriction in daily life include chronotype and less flexibility in times available for sleep on scheduled days versus free days. There is some evidence that these two factors interact, with morning types and evening types reporting similar sleep need, but evening types being more likely to accumulate a sleep debt during the week and to have greater sleep extension on weekend nights. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the independent contributions of circadian phase and weekend-to-weekday variability to sleep timing in daily life. The study included 14 morning types and 14 evening types recruited from a community-based sample of New Zealand adults (mean age 41.1 +/- 4.7 years). On days 1-15, the participants followed their usual routines in their own homes and daily sleep start, midpoint and end times were determined by actigraphy and sleep diaries. Days 16-17 involved a 17 h modified constant routine protocol in the laboratory (17:00 to 10:00, <20 lux) with half-hourly saliva samples assayed for melatonin. Mixed model ANCOVAs for repeated measures were used to investigate the independent relationships between sleep start and end times (separate models) and age (30-39 years versus 40-49 years), circadian phase [time of the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO)] and weekday/weekend schedules (Sunday-Thursday nights versus Friday-Saturday nights). As expected on weekdays, evening types had later sleep start times (mean = 23:47 versus 22:37, p < .0001) and end times (mean = 07:14 versus 05:56, p < .0001) than morning types. Similarly on weekend days, evening types had later sleep start times (mean = 00:14 versus 23:07, p = .0032) and end times (mean = 08:56 versus 07:04, p < .0001) than morning types. Evening types also had later DLMO (22:06 versus 20:46, p = .0002) than morning types (mean difference = 80.4 min, SE = 18.6 min). The ANCOVA models found that later sleep start times were associated with later DLMO (p = .0172) and weekend-to-weekday sleep timing variability (p < .0001), after controlling for age, while later sleep end times were associated with later DLMO (p = .0038), younger age (p = .0190) and weekend days (p < .0001). Sleep end times showed stronger association with DLMO (for every 30 min delay in DLMO, estimated mean sleep end time occurred 14.0 min later versus 10.19 min later for sleep start times). Sleep end times also showed greater delays on weekends versus weekdays (estimated mean delay for sleep end time = 84 min, for sleep start time = 28 min). Comparing morning types and evening types, the estimated contributions of the DLMO to the mean observed differences in sleep timing were on weekdays, 39% for sleep start times and 49% for sleep end times; and on weekends, 41% for sleep start times and 34% of sleep end times. We conclude that differences in sleep timing between morning types and evening types were much greater than would be predicted on the basis of the independent contribution of the difference in DLMO on both weekdays and weekend days. The timing of sleep in daily life involves complex interactions between physiological and psychosocial factors, which may be moderated by age in adults aged 30-49 years.
机译:导致睡眠时间和日常生活中睡眠受限的因素包括表型和计划的睡眠时间相对于自由活动时间的灵活性较差。有证据表明,这两个因素相互影响,早晨类型和晚上类型报告了相似的睡眠需求,但是晚上类型在一周中更可能积累睡眠债务,而周末晚上的睡眠时间更长。本研究的目的是评估昼夜节律和周末睡眠时间对周末睡眠时间的独立影响。该研究包括从以社区为基础的新西兰成年人(平均年龄41.1 +/- 4.7岁)中招募的14种早晨类型和14种夜间类型。在第1-15天,参与者按照自己的日常习惯在家中,每天的睡眠开始,中点和结束时间由书法和睡眠日记决定。第16-17天在实验室中进行了17 h修改后的固定常规规程(17:00至10:00,<20 lux),半小时唾液样本中测定了褪黑激素。重复测量的混合模型ANCOVA用于研究睡眠开始和结束时间(单独的模型)与年龄(30-39岁对40-49岁),昼夜节律[褪黑素褪黑素发作时间(DLMO)]之间的独立关系。 ]和工作日/周末时间表(周日至周四晚上与周五至周六晚上)。正如工作日所预期的那样,晚上类型的睡眠开始时间(早上= 23:47比22:37,p <.0001)和结束时间(平均时间= 07:14 vs 05:56,p <.0001)晚于早晨类型。 。同样在周末,晚上类型的睡眠开始时间(早上= 00:14 vs 23:07,p = 0.0023)和结束时间(早晨= 08:56 vs 07:04,p <.0001)晚于早晨类型。晚上类型的DLMO较早晨类型晚(22:06 vs 20:46,p = .0002)(平均差异= 80.4分钟,SE = 18.6分钟)。 ANCOVA模型发现,在控制了年龄之后,较晚的睡眠开始时间与较晚的DLMO(p = .0172)和周末至工作日的睡眠时间差异(p <.0001)相关,而较晚的睡眠结束时间与较晚的睡眠时间相关。 DLMO(p = .0038),较年轻的年龄(p = .0190)和周末(p <.0001)。睡眠结束时间显示出与DLMO的关联性更强(对于DLMO每延迟30分钟,估计的平均睡眠结束时间晚14.0分钟,而睡眠开始时间晚10.19分钟)。与工作日相比,周末的睡眠结束时间也显示出更大的延迟(睡眠结束时间的平均平均延迟= 84分钟,睡眠开始时间的平均延迟= 28分钟)。比较早晨和晚上的类型,DLMO对平均观察到的睡眠时间差异的估计贡献是在工作日,睡眠开始时间为39%,睡眠结束时间为49%;在周末,睡眠开始时间为41%,睡眠结束时间为34%。我们得出结论,早上和晚上类型之间的睡眠时间差异远大于根据平日和周末DLMO差异的独立贡献所预测的差异。日常生活中的睡眠时间涉及生理和社会心理因素之间的复杂相互作用,这可以通过30-49岁成年人的年龄来缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号