首页> 外文期刊>Chronobiology international >Validation of a chronotype questionnaire including an amplitude dimension
【24h】

Validation of a chronotype questionnaire including an amplitude dimension

机译:验证包括振幅维度的表型问卷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this paper was to validate a French version of the Chronotype Questionnaire (Ogińska, 2011, Pers. Individ. Dif. 50:1039-1043), which represents an interesting novelty in the psychometric assessment of chronotype, because it comprises not only an assessment of the morningness-eveningness (ME) dimension, but also a distinctness (DI) dimension (i.e., amplitude), which represents the range of diurnal variation. In study 1, we aimed to confirm the structure of the Chronotype Questionnaire, with two different samples, young adults (n = 338, mean ± SD = 18.70 ± 1.12 yrs, 244 men and 94 women) and old adults (n = 477, mean ± SD = 55.92 ± 11.9 yrs, 168 men and 310 women). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a poor fit in both samples as well as in the whole sample, which could be due to some inconsistencies in the original instrument, above all in the distinctness dimension. We therefore decided to revise the Chronotype Questionnaire, keeping the ME dimension, but refining the DI dimension. In study 2, with a new sample of 197 participants (mean ± SD = 22.71 ± 2.23 yrs, 105 men and 92 women), we examined the factor structure of the revised scale containing 18 items. The resulting questionnaire contained 16 items (i.e., 8 items on each scale), with item factor loadings higher than.45. In study 3, we aimed to confirm the factor structure of the instrument developed in study 2 as well as to examine its convergent validity, with a new sample of 158 participants (mean ± SD = 55.92 ± 11.9 yrs, 97 men and 61 women). Results of the CFA showed that a good fit of the model could be obtained with 16 items in the questionnaire. The new questionnaire derived from the original Chronotype Questionnaire was from now on called the Caen Chronotype Questionnaire (CCQ). Convergence validity was obtained with the Horne and ?stberg questionnaire and the ME scale of the CCQ, showing a negative significant relationship (r = -.82). The CCQ showed promising psychometric qualities, and further research should aim to combine it with physiological variables.
机译:本文的目的是验证法语版本的“时间型问卷”(Ogińska,2011年,Pers。Individ。Dif。50:1039-1043),它代表了对心理型测时的有趣的新颖性,因为它不仅包括对早晨-晚上(ME)维度的评估,也包括对昼夜变化范围的区别(DI)维度(即振幅)的评估。在研究1中,我们旨在通过两种不同的样本来确认“慢性问卷”的结构,即年轻人(n = 338,平均值±SD = 18.70±1.12岁,244名男性和94名女性)和老年人(n = 477,平均±SD = 55.92±11.9岁,男性168位,女性310位)。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,这两个样品以及整个样品的拟合度都很差,这可能是由于原始仪器的某些不一致性,尤其是在清晰度方面。因此,我们决定修订Chronotype问卷,保留ME维度,但完善DI维度。在研究2中,我们以197名参与者(平均±SD = 22.71±2.23岁,105名男性和92名女性)的新样本为样本,研究了包含18个项目的修订量表的因子结构。产生的问卷包含16项(即每个量表8项),项目要素负载大于45。在研究3中,我们旨在确认研究2中开发的仪器的因子结构并检验其收敛效度,新样本为158名参与者(平均±SD = 55.92±11.9岁,男性97位,女性61位) 。 CFA的结果表明,通过问卷中的16个项目可以获得模型的良好拟合。从最初的“分型问卷”衍生出的新调查表从现在开始被称为“卡恩分型问卷”(Caen)。通过Horne和?stberg问卷以及CCQ的ME量表获得了收敛效度,显示出负显着关系(r = -.82)。 CCQ表现出令人鼓舞的心理测量质量,进一步的研究应旨在将其与生理变量结合起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号