首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity and Conservation >Measuring the local community's participation in the management of community forests in Cameroon
【24h】

Measuring the local community's participation in the management of community forests in Cameroon

机译:评估喀麦隆当地社区对社区森林管理的参与

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cameroon revised its forestry policy and included the legal concept of community forests, a concept difficult to develop. This study aims to resolve this difficulty by understanding the concept as it is designed by the Cameroon Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MINEF). To this end, two formulae, the second simpler than the first, were developed to measure the percentage of involvement of the local community in the process of implementing a "community forest". A questionnaire constructed to assess the importance of the activities in this process provided the coefficients for the first formula. The questionnaire was administered to five groups representing the possible participants in the implementation process. There are statistically significant differences among the mean ratings of importance by the five groups and for the various activities. Despite the latter differences, the numerical difference between the two formulae is negligible. Correlations of the ranking of the importance of the activities predict successful collaboration among MINEF, conservation project officials, and members of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). In contrast, the local communities are less likely to collaborate with the first three groups. There is a gulf between the communities and outside organizations (Ministry, conservation project officials and NGOs). Strategies for facilitating the process of implementing the "community forest" are suggested.
机译:喀麦隆修改了其林业政策,纳入了社区森林的法律概念,这一概念很难发展。这项研究旨在通过理解喀麦隆环境与林业部(MINEF)设计的概念来解决这一难题。为此,开发了两个公式,第二个公式比第一个公式简单,以衡量当地社区在实施“社区森林”过程中的参与百分比。为评估活动在此过程中的重要性而构造的调查表为第一个公式提供了系数。问卷分为五个组,分别代表实施过程中的可能参与者。在五组之间以及在各项活动中,重要性的平均等级之间在统计学上有显着差异。尽管存在后者差异,但是两个公式之间的数值差异可以忽略不计。活动重要性排名的相关性预示了MINEF,保护项目官员和非政府组织成员之间的成功合作。相反,当地社区不太可能与前三个群体合作。社区与外部组织(部,保护项目官员和非政府组织)之间存在鸿沟。提出了促进实施“社区森林”过程的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号