首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >The importance of the superficial and profunda femoris arteries in limb salvage following endovascular treatment of chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease
【24h】

The importance of the superficial and profunda femoris arteries in limb salvage following endovascular treatment of chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease

机译:血管外治疗慢性主阴性闭塞病血管外治疗后血管裂解的浅表和ProFunda股票中的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThis study aimed to report the long-term limb salvage, survival and patency rates of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) when outflow was achieved through the profunda femoris artery (PFA) only vs both the PFA and superficial femoral artery (SFA). MethodsFrom January 2008 to July 2016, patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty at the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, S?o Paulo, Brazil, were classified into two groups according to whether they had femoral outflow via the PFA only (group 1) or both the PFA and SFA (group 2) in the affected leg. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival. The secondary outcomes were the patency and overall survival rates. ResultsIn total, 69 aortoiliac angioplasties were performed in 69 patients: 22 patients (31.8%) in group 1 and 47 (67.2%) in group 2. A total of 12 reinterventions (17.4%) were performed, seven (31.8%) in group 1 and five (10.2%) in group 2, without statistical significance between the groups (P?= .063). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2500?± 880.5?days. Both the primary and secondary patency rates analyzed at 1800?days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (80.2% vs 82.3%;P?=?.80 and 84.7% vs 97.6%;P?= .10, respectively). Furthermore, the limb salvage rates at 1800?days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (91.3% vs 86.1%;P?= .60), as were the survival rates (74.7% vs 78%;P?= .80). The Bollinger score was worse in group 1 (P?= .001), as expected, because of occlusion of the SFA. However, the PFA and popliteal artery scores were similar between the two groups. Occlusion of the SFA did not influence the limb salvage rate according to univariate analysis (P?= .509) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (P?= .671). ConclusionsThe patency of the SFA does not interfere with the outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic AIOD. The PFA in conjunction with the popliteal artery as the sole outflow route for iliac endovascular treatment is associated with similar patency, survival, and limb salvage rates as those for outflow through both the PFA and SFA.
机译:ObjectiveThis研究的目的是报告血管内治疗的长期保肢,生存和通畅率时,流出的是通过股深实现主髂动脉闭塞性疾病(AIOD)了大腿动脉(PFA)仅VS无论是PFA和股浅动脉(SFA) 。 MethodsFrom 2008年1月至2016年7月,患者AIOD谁在血管和血管内手术司进行主髂动脉血管成形术,医院做Servidor检察署埃斯塔杜阿尔,S圣保罗,巴西,分别根据他们是否通过了股流出分为两类PFA只(组1)或两个PFA和SFA在受影响的腿(组2)。主要的结果是无截肢生存。次要终点为通畅和生存率。 ResultsIn总,69个主髂动脉血管成形术是在69例患者进行的:22名患者(31.8%)在第1组和47(67.2%)的组进行2总共12再次干预(17.4%),7(31.8%)组中1和第2组5(10.2%),而组间统计学显着性(P = 0.063)。平均临床随访期为2500?±880.5?天。主要和次要通畅率在1800分析天各组1和2之间相似?(80.2%对82.3%,P =?80和84.7%比97.6%;分别为P = 0.10,?)。 ?此外,在1800的肢率日子组1和2之间是相似的(91.3%对86.1%; P = 0.60),因为是存活率(74.7%比78%; P = 0.80?)。布林得分是在第1组更差(P 2 = 0.001),如所预期,因为SFA的闭塞。然而,PFA和腘动脉分数两组相似。的SFA闭塞根据单变量分析(P = 0.509)和多变量Cox回归分析(P = 0.671)不影响肢率。国家林业局的ConclusionsThe通畅不与血管内治疗慢性AIOD的结果产生干扰。在腘动脉为髂血管内治疗的唯一途径流出会同PFA与类似的通畅,生存,和那些同时通过PFA和SFA流出保肢率有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号