...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Patient satisfaction with the consent discussion is not improved by showing patients their computed tomography or angiography images before they undergo?vascular surgery
【24h】

Patient satisfaction with the consent discussion is not improved by showing patients their computed tomography or angiography images before they undergo?vascular surgery

机译:患者满意于同意讨论,通过显示在他们经历之前的患者的患者患者(血管造影图像)之前没有改善?血管手术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectivePatient-based decision aids and other multimedia tools have been developed to help enrich the preoperative discussion between surgeon and patient. Use of these tools, however, can be time-consuming and logistically challenging. We investigated whether simply showing patients their images from preoperative computed tomography (CT) or angiography would improve patients' satisfaction with the preoperative discussion. We also examined whether this improved the patient's understanding and trust and whether it contributed to increased preoperative anxiety. MethodsPatients undergoing either elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or lower limb revascularization were randomly assigned to either standard perioperative discussion or perioperative discussion and review of images (CT image or angiogram). Randomization was concealed and stratified by surgeon. Primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the preoperative discussion as measured by a validated 7-item scale (score, 0-28), with higher scores indicating improved satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient understanding, patient anxiety, patient trust, and length of preoperative discussion. Scores were compared usingt-test. ResultsOverall, 51 patients were randomized, 25 to the intervention arm (discussion and imaging) and 26 to the control arm. Most patients were male (69%), and the average age was 70?years. Forty percent of patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, whereas 60% underwent lower limb revascularization. Patient satisfaction with the discussion was generally high, with no added improvement when preoperative images were reviewed (mean score, 24.9?± 3.02 vs 24.8?± 2.93;P?= .88). Similarly, there was no difference in the patient's anxiety, level of trust, or understanding when the imaging review was compared with standard discussion. There was a trend toward longer preoperative discussions in the group that underwent imaging review (8.18 vs 6.35?minutes;P?= .07). ConclusionsShowing patients their CT or angiography images during the preoperative discussion does not improve the patient's satisfaction with the consent discussion. Similarly, there was no effect on the patient's trust, understanding, or anxiety level. Our conclusions are limited by the lack of a standardized measure of patient understanding and not measuring outcomes postoperatively, both of which should be considered in future studies.
机译:已经制定了目的地的决策辅助辅助工具和其他多媒体工具,以帮助丰富外科医生和患者之间的术前讨论。然而,使用这些工具可能是耗时和逻辑上的具有挑战性。我们调查了简单地显示患者从术前计算断层扫描(CT)或血管造影的图像是否会改善患者对术前讨论的满意度。我们还检查了这种改善了患者的理解和信任以及是否有助于增加术前焦虑。接受选修腹主动脉瘤修复或下肢血运重建的方法分配给标准围手术期讨论或围手术期讨论和审查图像(CT图像或血管造影)。随机化被外科医生隐藏和分层。主要结果是患者满意于通过经过验证的7项规模(得分,0-28)测量的术前讨论,具有更高的分数,表明提高满意度。二次结果包括患者理解,患者焦虑,患者信任和术前讨论的长度。使用测试比较分数。结果,51名患者随机,25例,干预臂(讨论和成像)和26到控制臂。大多数患者是男性(69%),平均年龄为70岁。患有腹主动脉动脉瘤修复的40%的患者,而60%接受了下肢血运重建。患者对讨论的满意度通常很高,当审查术前图像时没有添加改进(平均得分,24.9?±3.02 Vs 24.8?±2.93; p?= .88)。同样,患者的焦虑,信任程度或与标准讨论进行比较时,患者的焦虑,信任程度或理解没有差异。在接受影像评论的集团中展现了更长的术前讨论(8.18 vs 6.35?分钟; p?= .07)。结论在术前讨论期间,他们的CT或血管造影图像不会改善患者对同意讨论的满意度。同样,对患者的信任,理解或焦虑水平没有影响。我们的结论受到缺乏标准化患者理解的标准化衡量标准衡量标准衡量标准,两者都应在未来的研究中考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号