...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >Nedaplatin Plus Docetaxel Versus Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung — A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial
【24h】

Nedaplatin Plus Docetaxel Versus Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung — A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial

机译:Nedaplatin Plus Docetaxel与Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel作为肺部晚期鳞状细胞癌的一线化学疗法 - 多中心,开放标签,随机,第三阶段试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of first-line nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) (ND) versus cisplatin (75 mg/m2) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) (CD) in patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma. MethodsThis open-label randomized controlled phase III trial was performed at 12 hospitals in China. Patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma were randomized to four cycles of ND or CD. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included time to progression, best overall response, and adverse events. ResultsIn the intent-to-treat analysis set (ND: n?= 141; CD: n?= 139), median PFS was 4.63 months (95% confidence interval: 4.43–5.10) for the ND and 4.23 months (95% confidence interval: 3.37–4.53) for CD groups (p?=?0.056). No significant difference in time to progression was observed between the two groups. Best overall responses and disease control rate were better with ND?51.5%, than with CD 38.1% (p?=0.033 andp?=0.0004, respectively). Grade III or IV adverse events and grade 3-4 nausea and fatigue were more frequent in the CD group compared with the ND group (allp <0.05). ConclusionsThere is no improvement in PFS with the nedaplatin and docetaxel combination in the intent-to-treat analysis. More hematologic toxicities were observed in the?ND group (compared with CD), whereas more nonhematologic?toxicities were observed in the CD group. ND could be a new treatment option for advanced or relapsed squamous cell lung cancer(NCT02088515atClinicalTrials.gov).
机译:旨在比较第一线Nedaplatin(80mg / m2)加多西紫杉醇(75mg / m2)(Nd)与顺铂(75mg / m2)加入的患者疗效进行比较患者的疗效具有晚期鳞状细胞肺癌。方法可以在中国的12家医院进行Open-Label随机控制第III款试验。鳞状细胞肺癌患者随机分为四个Nd或Cd循环。主要终点是无进展的存活率(PFS)。辅助端点包括进展的时间,最佳整体反应和不良事件。结果旨在意图对治疗分析集(ND:N?= 141; CD:N?= 139),ND和4.23个月的中位数PFS为4.63个月(95%的置信区间:4.43-5.10)(95%的信心间隔:3.37-4.53)用于CD组(p?= 0.056)。两组之间观察到延迟进展的显着差异。最佳的整体反应和疾病控制率与ND?51.5%更好,而不是CD 38.1%(p?= 0.033 andp?= 0.0004)。与ND组相比,III级或IV级不良事件和3-4级恶心和疲劳在CD组中更频繁地(ALLP <0.05)。结论与NEDAPLATIN和DOCETAXEL组合的PFS在意图分析中没有改善。在Nd组(与CD相比)中观察到更多的血液学毒性,而在CD组中观察到更多的非激散性毒性。 ND可以是晚期或复发鳞状细胞肺癌的新治疗选择(NCT02088515ATClinicalTrials.gov)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号