首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >GAPcare: The Geriatric Acute and Post‐Acute Fall Prevention Intervention in the Emergency Department: Preliminary Data
【24h】

GAPcare: The Geriatric Acute and Post‐Acute Fall Prevention Intervention in the Emergency Department: Preliminary Data

机译:GAPCARE:急诊部急性和急性秋季预防干预急诊急诊干预:初步数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe a new multidisciplinary team fall prevention intervention for older adults who seek care in the emergency department (ED) after having a fall, assess its feasibility and acceptability, and review lessons learned during its initiation. DESIGN Single‐blind randomized controlled pilot study. SETTING Two urban academic EDs PARTICIPANTS Adults 65?years old or older (n = 110) who presented to the ED within 7?days of a fall. INTERVENTION Participants were randomized to a usual care (UC) and an intervention (INT) arm. Participants in the INT arm received a brief medication therapy management session delivered by a pharmacist and a fall risk assessment and plan by a physical therapist (PT). INT participants received referrals to outpatient services (eg, home safety evaluation, outpatient PT). MEASUREMENTS We used participant, caregiver, and clinician surveys, as well as electronic health record review, to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS Of the 110 participants, the median participant age was 81?years old, 67% were female, 94% were white, and 16.3% had cognitive impairment. Of the 55 in the INT arm, all but one participant received the pharmacy consult (98.2%); the PT consult was delivered to 83.6%. Median consult time was 20 minutes for pharmacy and 20 minutes for PT. ED length of stay was not increased in the INT arm: UC 5.25?hours vs INT 5.0 hours ( P ?.94). After receiving the Geriatric Acute and Post‐acute Fall Prevention Intervention (GAPcare), 100% of participants and 97.6% of clinicians recommended the pharmacy consult, and 95% of participants and 95.8% of clinicians recommended the PT consult. CONCLUSION These findings support the feasibility and acceptability of the GAPcare model in the ED. A future larger randomized controlled trial is planned to determine whether GAPcare can reduce recurrent falls and healthcare visits in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:198–206, 2019
机译:目标我们旨在描述一个新的多学科团队,为在处于急诊部门(ED)后寻求护理的老年人的新成年人,评估其可行性和可接受性,以及在启动期间审查经验教训。设计单盲随机控制试点研究。设定两名城市学术EDS参与者成年人65?岁或以上(n = 110),谁在7日内呈现给ed。干预参与者随机被随机化为通常的护理(UC)和干预(INT)ARM。 int ARM中的参与者通过物理治疗师(PT),通过药剂师和秋季风险评估和计划进行了一段短暂的药物治疗管理会议。 int参与者接受了外科服务的推荐(例如,家庭安全评估,门诊PT)。测量我们使用参与者,护理人员和临床医生调查,以及电子健康记录评论,以评估干预的可行性和可接受性。 110名参与者的结果,中位数参加年龄为81岁?岁月,67%是女性,94%是白色的,16.3%有认知障碍。在int arm的55中,除了一个参与者的所有参与者都收到了药房咨询(98.2%); PT咨询已达到83.6%。药房的中位数咨询时间为20分钟,而Pt为20分钟。 int手臂的逗留时间没有增加:UC 5.25?小时Vs int 5.0小时(p <。94)。收到老年急性和急性秋季预防干预(GapCare),100%的参与者和97.6%的临床医生建议药房咨询,95%的参与者和95.8%的临床医生推荐了PT咨询。结论这些调查结果支持ED中GAPCARE模型的可行性和可接受性。未来的未来随机对照试验计划确定GapCare是否可以减少老年人的复发性跌倒和医疗保健。 J AM Geriadr SOC 68:198-206,2019

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号