...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Improved Quality of Death and Dying in Care Homes: A Palliative Care Stepped Wedge Randomized Control Trial in Australia
【24h】

Improved Quality of Death and Dying in Care Homes: A Palliative Care Stepped Wedge Randomized Control Trial in Australia

机译:改善了保健家园的死亡质量和死亡:澳大利亚的姑息治疗阶梯式楔形随机控制试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES Mortality in care homes is high, but care of dying residents is often suboptimal, and many services do not have easy access to specialist palliative care. This study examined the impact of providing specialist palliative care on residents' quality of death and dying. DESIGN Using a stepped wedge randomized control trial, care homes were randomly assigned to crossover from control to intervention using a random number generator. Analysis used a generalized linear and latent mixed model. The trial was registered with ANZCTR: ACTRN12617000080325. SETTING Twelve Australian care homes in Canberra, Australia. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1700 non‐respite residents were reviewed from the 12 participating care homes. Of these residents, 537 died and 471 had complete data for analysis. The trial ran between February 2017 and June 2018. INTERVENTION Palliative Care Needs Rounds (hereafter Needs Rounds) are monthly hour‐long staff‐only triage meetings to discuss residents at risk of dying without a plan in place. They are chaired by a specialist palliative care clinician and attended by care home staff. A checklist is followed to guide discussions and outcomes, focused on anticipatory planning. MEASUREMENTS This article reports secondary outcomes of staff perceptions of residents' quality of death and dying, care home staff confidence, and completion of advance care planning documentation. We assessed (1) quality of death and dying, and (2) staff capability of adopting a palliative approach, completion of advance care plans, and medical power of attorney. RESULTS Needs Rounds are associated with staff perceptions that residents had a better quality of death and dying ( P ??.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.83‐12.21), particularly in the 10 facilities that complied with the intervention protocol ( P ??.01; 95% CI = 6.37‐13.32). Staff self‐reported perceptions of capability increased ( P ??.01; 95% CI = 2.73‐6.72). CONCLUSION The data offer evidence for monthly triage meetings to transform the lives, deaths, and care of older people residing in care homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:305–312, 2020
机译:目标在护理家庭中的目标很高,但关心垂死的居民通常是次优,许多服务并没有容易获得专业姑息治疗。本研究审查了为专业姑息治疗居民死亡和死亡质量的影响。使用阶梯式楔形随机控制试验设计,随机分配护理室以使用随机数发生器从控制交叉到干预。分析使用了广义线性和潜在的混合模型。该试验在ANZCTR注册:ACTRN12617000080325。在澳大利亚堪培拉设置十二澳大利亚护理家园。参与者共有1700名非喘息的居民从12名参与家庭审查。在这些居民的中,537个死亡和471人有完整的分析数据。该试验在2017年2月和2018年6月之间进行了干预姑息治疗需求轮次(以下,需要轮次)是每月长的工作人员,仅限于仅在没有计划的情况下讨论死亡风险的居民。他们由专业姑息治疗临床医生主持,并由护理家庭工作人员参加。清单遵循指导讨论和结果,专注于预期规划。测量本文报告了居民死亡和死亡,护理家庭员工信心的职员质量的二次结果,以及完成预付款规划文件。我们评估了(1)死亡质量和死亡质量,(2)采用姑息方法的员工,预先完成经纪人,以及律师的医疗力。结果需求轮与员工具有更好的死亡和死亡质量(p?& 01; 95%置信区间[CI] = 1.83-12.21),特别是在遵守干预的10个设施中方案(p?&Δ。01; 95%ci = 6.37-13.32)。工作人员自我报告的能力的看法增加(p?&Δ。01; 95%ci = 2.73-6.72)。结论数据提供每月分类会议的证据,以改变居住在护理房屋中的老年人的生命,死亡和关怀。 J AM Geriadr SOC 68:305-312,2020

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号