首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial.

机译:心脏手术后输血要求:TRACS随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Perioperative red blood cell transfusion is commonly used to address anemia, an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality after cardiac operations; however, evidence regarding optimal blood transfusion practice in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To define whether a restrictive perioperative red blood cell transfusion strategy is as safe as a liberal strategy in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Transfusion Requirements After Cardiac Surgery (TRACS) study, a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical noninferiority trial conducted between February 2009 and February 2010 in an intensive care unit at a university hospital cardiac surgery referral center in Brazil. Consecutive adult patients (n = 502) who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were eligible; analysis was by intention-to-treat. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to a liberal strategy of blood transfusion (to maintain a hematocrit >/=30%) or to a restrictive strategy (hematocrit >/=24%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Composite end point of 30-day all-cause mortality and severe morbidity (cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or acute renal injury requiring dialysis or hemofiltration) occurring during the hospital stay. The noninferiority margin was predefined at -8% (ie, 8% minimal clinically important increase in occurrence of the composite end point). RESULTS: Hemoglobin concentrations were maintained at a mean of 10.5 g/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4-10.6) in the liberal-strategy group and 9.1 g/dL (95% CI, 9.0-9.2) in the restrictive-strategy group (P < .001). A total of 198 of 253 patients (78%) in the liberal-strategy group and 118 of 249 (47%) in the restrictive-strategy group received a blood transfusion (P < .001). Occurrence of the primary end point was similar between groups (10% liberal vs 11% restrictive; between-group difference, 1% [95% CI, -6% to 4%]; P = .85). Independent of transfusion strategy, the number of transfused red blood cell units was an independent risk factor for clinical complications or death at 30 days (hazard ratio for each additional unit transfused, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.4]; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the use of a restrictive perioperative transfusion strategy compared with a more liberal strategy resulted in noninferior rates of the combined outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality and severe morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01021631.
机译:背景:围手术期红细胞输血通常用于解决贫血,心脏病后的发病率和死亡率的独立危险因素;然而,缺乏有关患有心脏手术的患者的最佳输血实践的证据。目的:定义限制性围手术期红细胞输血策略是否尽可能安全地作为接受选修心脏手术的患者的自由策略。设计,设定和患者:心脏手术后的输血要求(TRACS)研究,2009年2月和2010年2月在巴西大学医院心脏手术转诊中心的重症监护手册中进行的前瞻性,随机,受控临床非资治性试验。连续的成年患者(n = 502)患有心肺手术的心肺手术符合条件;分析是通过意向治疗。干预:患者被随机分配给输血的自由主义策略(保持血细胞比容> / = 30%)或限制策略(血细胞比容> / = 24%)。主要结果措施:在住院期间,综合终点为30天的全导致死亡率和严重发病率(需要透析或血液过滤的急性呼吸窘迫综合征或急性肾损伤)。非闭合余量预定义为-8%(即,在复合终点发生的发生术后8%的临床上重要增加)。结果:在自由策略组和9.1g / dl(95%CI,9.0-9.2)中,血红蛋白浓度保持在10.5g / dl(95%置信区间[CI],10.4-10.6)中的限制-strategy组(p <.001)。 198例198名253名患者(78%)在自由主义策略组中,限制性策略组的118名(47%)接受了输血(P <.001)。初级点的发生在组之间相似(10%自由主义与11%限制;组差异,1%[95%CI,-6%至4%]; p = .85)。独立于输血策略,转染红细胞单位的数量是临床并发症或30天死亡的独立危险因素(每次另外的单位的危险比,1.2 [95%CI,1.1-1.4]; P = .002 )。结论:患有心脏手术的患者,利用限制性围手术期输血策略与更自由策略相比,导致综合结果的非流体率为30天的全导致死亡率和严重发病率。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01021631。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号