...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study.

机译:艾塞纳西亚肽的功效和安全性与二甲双胍,吡格列酮和SitaGliptin用作2型糖尿病患者的单药治疗(持续时间4):26周的双盲研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks. MET and PIO therapies were increased to maximum-tolerated dosages. Injections with EQW or placebo were administered weekly, while oral medication or placebo was administered daily. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were as follows: 59% men, 67% Caucasian, mean age 54 years, HbA(1c) 8.5%, fasting serum glucose 9.9 mmol/L, body weight 87.0 kg, and diabetes duration 2.7 years. HbA(1c) reductions (%) at 26 weeks (least-squares means) with EQW versus MET, PIO, and SITA were -1.53 vs. -1.48 (P = 0.620), -1.63 (P = 0.328), and -1.15 (P < 0.001), respectively. Weight changes (kg) were -2.0 vs. -2.0 (P = 0.892), +1.5 (P < 0.001), and -0.8 (P < 0.001), respectively. Common adverse events were as follows: EQW, nausea (11.3%) and diarrhea (10.9%); MET, diarrhea (12.6%) and headache (12.2%); PIO, nasopharyngitis (8.6%) and headache (8.0%); and SIT, nasopharyngitis (9.8%) and headache (9.2%). Minor (confirmed) hypoglycemia was rarely reported. No major hypoglycemia occurred. CONCLUSIONS: EQW was noninferior to MET but not PIO and superior to SITA with regard to HbA(1c) reduction at 26 weeks. Of the agents studied, EQW and MET provided similar improvements in glycemic control along with the benefit of weight reduction and no increased risk of hypoglycemia.
机译:目的:测试艾塞那肽的每周一次(EQW)的安全性和疗效与二甲双胍(MET),吡格列酮(PIO)和西他列汀(SITA)在26周相比,未达最佳的治疗(饮食和运动),首次用药的患者类型2型糖尿病。研究设计和方法:患者被随机分为皮下(SC)EQW 2.0毫克+口服安慰剂(n = 248),MET 2000毫克/天+ SC安慰剂(n = 246),PIO 45毫克/天+ SC安慰剂(n = 163),或SITA 100mg /天+ SC安慰剂(n = 163)26周。 MET和PIO治疗增加至最大耐受剂量。用EQW或安慰剂注射每周给药,而口服药物或安慰剂每日给药。结果:基线特征如下:59%为男性,67%高加索人,平均年龄54岁,糖化血红蛋白(1C)8.5%,空腹血清葡萄糖9.9毫摩尔/ L,体重87.0公斤,和糖尿病病程2.7年。糖化血红蛋白(1C)的减少(%)在第26周(最小二乘装置)与EQW与MET,PIO,和SITA为-1.53​​ -1.48对比(P = 0.620),-1.63(P = 0.328),和-1.15 (P <0.001),分别。体重变化(公斤)为-2.0 -2.0对比(P = 0.892),1.5(P <0.001),和-0.8(P <0.001),分别。常见不良反应为:EQW,恶心(11.3%),腹泻(10.9%); MET,腹泻(12.6%)和头痛(12.2%); PIO,鼻咽炎(8.6%)和头痛(8.0%);和SIT,鼻咽炎(9.8%)和头痛(9.2%)。未成年人(确认)低血糖鲜有报道。没有发生重大的低血糖。结论:EQW不劣于MET但不PIO和优于SITA关于的HbA(1c)的还原在26周。研究的一级代理商,EQW和MET提供轻量化的利益,没有低血糖的风险增加以及血糖控制类似的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号