...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in pediatrics >The hygiene hypothesis revisited: Does exposure to infectious agents protect us from allergy?
【24h】

The hygiene hypothesis revisited: Does exposure to infectious agents protect us from allergy?

机译:重新审视了卫生假说:接触传染源是否可以保护我们免受过敏?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose of review: The increase in incidence and prevalence of allergic disease remains a mystery and cannot be explained solely by genetic factors. The hygiene hypothesis provides the strongest epidemiological explanation for the rise in allergic disease. This review evaluates the recent epidemiological and mechanistic research in the role of infectious agents in the pathogenesis of or protection from allergic disease. Recent findings: Recent literature has extended the epidemiological findings of the protective effect of being born and reared in a farm environment and associates an increased diversity of organisms in house-dust samples with protection from allergic disease. Furthermore, human and animal studies provide increasing evidence for the role of both the innate and adaptive immune systems, including regulatory cells, as mediators of this protective effect. Summary: There is evidence that exposure to some infectious organisms can protect from atopy, whereas other infections appear to promote allergic diseases. The timing of exposure to infection and the properties of the infectious agent, in addition to the genetic susceptibility of the host, play an important role in the future development of allergic disease.
机译:审查目的:过敏性疾病的发病率和患病率增加仍然是一个谜,不能仅通过遗传因素来解释。卫生假说为过敏性疾病的流行提供了最有力的流行病学解释。这篇评论评估了传染病在变应性疾病的发病机理或保护中的作用的最新流行病学和机理研究。最近的发现:最近的文献扩展了在农场环境中出生和饲养对动物的保护作用的流行病学发现,并将室内灰尘样品中增加的生物多样性与对过敏性疾病的保护联系起来。此外,人类和动物研究为先天性和适应性免疫系统(包括调节细胞)作为这种保护作用的介质提供了越来越多的证据。摘要:有证据表明,接触某些传染性生物可以预防特应性疾病,而其他感染则似乎促进了过敏性疾病。除了宿主的遗传易感性外,暴露于感染的时间和传染原的特性在过敏性疾病的未来发展中也起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号