...
首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases >A randomized trial to assess whether portal pressure guided therapy to prevent variceal rebleeding improves survival in cirrhosis
【24h】

A randomized trial to assess whether portal pressure guided therapy to prevent variceal rebleeding improves survival in cirrhosis

机译:一种随机试验,以评估门静脉压力引导治疗是否预防静脉曲张的菌丝可改善肝硬化的存活

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Monitoring the hemodynamic response of portal pressure (PP) to drug therapy accurately stratifies the risk of variceal rebleeding (VRB). We assessed whether guiding therapy with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) monitoring may improve survival by preventing VRB. Patients with cirrhosis with controlled variceal bleeding were randomized to an HVPG‐guided therapy group (N?=?84) or to a control group (N?=?86). In both groups, HVPG and acute β‐blocker response were evaluated at baseline and HVPG measurements were repeated at 2‐4 weeks to determine chronic response. In the HVPG‐guided group, acute responders were treated with nadolol and acute nonresponders with nadolol+nitrates. Chronic nonresponders received nadolol+prazosin and had a third HVPG study. Ligation sessions were repeated until response was achieved. The control group was treated with nadolol+nitrates+ligation. Between‐group baseline characteristics were similar. During long‐term follow‐up (median of 24 months), mortality was lower in the HVPG‐guided therapy group than in the control group (29% vs. 43%; hazard ratio [HR]?=?0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?0.35‐0.99). Rebleeding occurred in 19% versus 31% of patients, respectively (HR?=?0.53; 95% CI?=?0.29‐0.98), and further decompensation of cirrhosis occurred in 52% versus 72% (HR?=?0.68; 95% CI?=?0.46‐0.99). The survival probability was higher with HVPG‐guided therapy than in controls, both in acute (HR?=?0.59; 95% CI?=?0.32‐1.08) and chronic nonresponders (HR?=?0.48; 95% CI?=?0.23‐0.99). HVPG‐guided patients had a greater reduction of HVPG and a lower final value than controls ( P ??0.05). Conclusion : HVPG monitoring, by stratifying risk and targeting therapy, improves the survival achieved with currently recommended treatment to prevent VRB using β‐blockers and ligation. HVPG‐guided therapy achieved a greater reduction in PP, which may have contributed to reduce the risk of rebleeding and of further decompensation of cirrhosis, thus contributing to a better survival. (H epatology 2017;65:1693‐1707).
机译:监测门静脉压力(PP)的血流动力学反应的药物治疗准确进行分层静脉曲张出血(VRB)的风险。我们评估是否与引导肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)监测治疗可以通过防止VRB提高存活率。患者具有受控静脉曲张出血性肝硬化患者随机的HVPG引导治疗组(N =?84)或作为对照组(N =?86)​​。在两组中,HVPG和急性β受体阻滞剂响应在基线进行评价,重复HVPG测量在2-4周,以确定慢性响应。在HVPG指导组,急性应答者与纳多洛尔+硝酸盐纳多洛尔和急性非应答者处理。慢性无应答者收到纳多洛尔+哌唑嗪和有第三HVPG研究。重复结扎会话,直到反应达到了。对照组用纳多洛尔+硝酸盐+结扎处理。组间的基线特征是相似的。在长期随访(24个月中位数),死亡率为HVPG引导治疗组比对照组(29%比43%低;风险比(HR)= 0.59;?95%的置信区间[CI] =?0.35-0.99)。再出血发生于19%对31%的患者,分别为(HR = 0.53;????95%CI = 0.29-0.98),和肝硬化的进一步失代偿发生在52%和72%(HR = 0.68;?95 %CI =?0.46-0.99)。存活概率是与HVPG引导治疗比对照更高,在急性(HR = 0.59;????95%CI = 0.32-1.08)和无反应者慢性(HR = 0.48;????95%CI =? 0.23-0.99)。 HVPG引导患者HVPG的更大的减少和比对照组更低的最终值(P< 0.05?)。结论:HVPG监测,通过分层风险和靶向治疗,提高了使用β受体阻滞剂和结扎与目前推荐的治疗,以达到防止VRB生存。 HVPG引导治疗实现了PP更大的减少,这可能有助于降低再出血和肝硬化的进一步失代偿的风险,从而有助于更好地存活。 (H epatology 2017; 65:1693至1707年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号