...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Impact of Extra-anatomical Hepatic Artery Reconstruction During Living Donor Liver Transplantation on Biliary Complications and Graft and Patient Survival
【24h】

Impact of Extra-anatomical Hepatic Artery Reconstruction During Living Donor Liver Transplantation on Biliary Complications and Graft and Patient Survival

机译:在胆道并发症患者肝脏移植过程中的影响肝癌和患者生存期间的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of extra-anatomical hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LT). Methods. Patients who underwent their first living donor LT at our center between January 2008 and December 2017 were reviewed. HA reconstruction was classified as anatomical or extra-anatomical reconstruction (EAR). We compared the background characteristics and posttransplantation outcomes, including complications, biliary complications, graft survival, and overall survival. The potential risk factors for bile leakage were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, while risk factors for biliary stricture-free survival, graft survival, and overall survival were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. Results. Among 800 patients, 35 (4.4%) underwent EAR, of whom 7 (7/35, 20.0%) experienced HA complications after the initial anatomical reconstruction and required EAR during reoperation. Patients who underwent EAR (n = 2/35, 5.7%) had a similar rate of HA complications compared with those who underwent anatomical reconstruction (n = 46/772, 5.9%, P = 0.699). EAR was a significant risk factor for bile leakage (odds ratio [OR], 4.167; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.928-9.006; P < 0.001) along with multiple bile ducts (OR, 1.606; 95% CI, 1.022-2.526; P = 0.040) and hepaticojejunostomy (OR, 4.108; 95% CI, 2.190-7.707; P < 0.001). However, EAR had no statistical relationship to biliary stricture-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.602; 95% CI, 0.982-2.613; P = 0.059), graft survival (HR, 1.745; 95% CI, 0.741-4.109; P = 0.203), or overall survival (HR, 1.405; 95% CI, 0.786-2.513; P = 0.251). HA complications were associated with poor biliary stricture-free survival (HR, 2.060; 95% CI, 1.329-3.193; P = 0.001), graft survival (HR, 5.549; 95% CI, 2.883-10.681; P < 0.001), and overall survival (HR, 1.958; 95% CI, 1.195-3.206; P = 0.008). Conclusion. Extra-anatomical HA reconstruction during living donor LT was not a risk factor for biliary stricture, graft failure, or overall survival.
机译:背景。本研究旨在分析生活供体肝移植(LT)中的分析肝动脉(HA)重建的可行性。方法。在2008年1月至2017年1月至2017年12月在我们的中心接受过他们的第一个生活捐助者的患者进行了审查。 HA重建被归类为解剖或额外解剖重建(耳朵)。我们比较了背景特征和后翻透结果,包括并发症,胆汁并发症,移植物生存和整体存活。使用多变量的逻辑回归分析了胆汁泄漏的潜在风险因素,而使用多变量的Cox回归分析了胆道狭窄的存活,移植物存活和整体存活的危险因素。结果。在800名患者中,35名(4.4%)接受耳朵,其中7月7日(7 / 35,20.0%)在初始解剖重建后经历了HA并发症,在再次操作期间需要耳朵。与接受解剖重建的人相比,接受耳(n = 2/35,5.7%)的患者具有类似的HA并发症率(n = 46/772,5.9%,p = 0.699)。耳朵是胆汁泄漏的显着风险因素(差距[或],4.167; 95%置信区间[CI],1.928-9.006; p <0.001)以及多个胆管(或1.606; 95%CI,1.022- 2.526; p = 0.040)和肝脏jenulostomy(或4.108; 95%ci,2.190-7.707; p <0.001)。然而,耳朵与胆道狭窄存活(危险比[HR],1.602; 95%CI,0.982-2.613; p = 0.059),移植物存活(HR,1.745; 95%CI,0.741-4.109; P = 0.203),或总存活(HR,1.405; 95%CI,0.786-2.513; P = 0.251)。 HA并发症与胆道狭窄存活不良(HR,2.060; 95%CI,1.329-3.193; P = 0.001),移植物存活(HR,5.549; 95%CI,2.883-10.681; P <0.001)和总生存(HR,1.958; 95%CI,1.195-3.206; P = 0.008)。结论。生活供体中的额外解剖学HA重建不是胆道狭窄,移植物失败或整体存活的危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号