首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Sample collection and sample handling errors submitted to the transfusion error surveillance system, 2006 to 2015
【24h】

Sample collection and sample handling errors submitted to the transfusion error surveillance system, 2006 to 2015

机译:提交给输血错误监视系统的示例收集和样本处理错误,2006-2015

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND In Canada, transfusion‐related errors are voluntarily reported to a tracking system with the goal to systematically improve transfusion safety. This report provides an analysis of sample collection (SC) and sample handling (SH) errors from this national error‐tracking system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Errors from 2006 to 2015 from 23 participating sites were extracted. A survey was conducted to obtain information regarding institutional policies. Samples received in the blood bank were used to calculate rates. “Wrong blood in tube” (WBIT) errors are blood taken from wrong patient and labeled with intended patient's information, or blood taken from intended patient but labeled with another patient's information. RESULTS A total of 42,363 SC and 14,666 SH errors were reported. Predefined low‐severity (low potential for harm) and high‐severity errors (potential for fatal outcomes) increased from 2006 to 2015 (low SC, SH: 13‐27, 3‐12 per 1000; high SC, SH: 1.9‐3.7, 0.5‐2.0 per 1000). The WBIT rate decreased from 12 to 5.8 per 10,000 between 2006 and 2015 (p??0.0001). The overall WBIT rate was 6.2 per 10,000, with variability by site (median, 0.3 per 10,000; range, 0‐17 per 10,000). Sites with error detection mechanisms, such as regrouping second sample requirements, had lower error rates than sites that did not (SC, SH: 12, 1 per 1000 samples vs. 17, 3 per 1000 samples; p??0.0001). CONCLUSION WBIT rates decreased significantly. Low‐severity error rates are climbing likely due to increased ascertainment and reporting. Prevention studies are necessary to inform changes to blood transfusion standards to eliminate these errors.
机译:背景技术在加拿大,输血相关误差被自愿向跟踪系统报告,目标是系统地改善输血安全。本报告提供了对本国错误跟踪系统的样本收集(SC)和样本处理(SH)误差的分析。提取了23个参与网站2006年至2015年的研究设计和方法错误。进行了一项调查,以获取有关机构政策的信息。在血库中接收的样品用于计算速率。 “管中的血液错误”(With)错误是从错误的患者中取出的血液,并用预期的患者的信息标记,或者从预期的患者中取出的血液,但用另一种患者的信息标记。结果共报告了42,363杆和14,666株误差。预定义的低严重程度(低危害可能性)和高度严重性误差(致命结果的潜力)从2006年到2015年增加(低SC,SH:13-27,每1000 3-12;高SC,SH:1.9-3.7 ,每1000 0.5-2.0)。 2006和2015之间的Wbit率从每10,000之间的12%降低(p?&?0.0001)。整体WBIT率为每10,000率为6.2,由地点(中位数,0.30,000;范围,每10,000级)变异性。具有错误检测机制的站点,例如重新组合第二个样本要求,比没有(SC,SH:12,117,每1000个样品的SC:12,11,3/1000样品的SC:12,13,3的网站具有较低的误差率;p≤≤0.0001)。结论WIT率明显下降。由于进程和报告增加,低严重程度的错误率可能攀升。预防研究是必要的,以便为血液输送标准进行信息,以消除这些错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号