...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Peer-supported self-management for people discharged from a mental health crisis team: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Peer-supported self-management for people discharged from a mental health crisis team: a randomised controlled trial

机译:对从心理健康危机队发出的人的同行支持自我管理:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundHigh resource expenditure on acute care is a challenge for mental health services aiming to focus on supporting recovery, and relapse after an acute crisis episode is common. Some evidence supports self-management interventions to prevent such relapses, but their effect on readmissions to acute care following a crisis is untested. We tested whether a self-management intervention facilitated by peer support workers could reduce rates of readmission to acute care for people discharged from crisis resolution teams, which provide intensive home treatment following a crisis. MethodsWe did a randomised controlled superiority trial recruiting participants from six crisis resolution teams in England. Eligible participants had been on crisis resolution team caseloads for at least a week, and had capacity to give informed consent. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups by an unmasked data manager. Those collecting and analysing data were masked to allocation, but participants were not. Participants in the intervention group were offered up to ten sessions with a peer support worker who supported them in completing a personal recovery workbook, including formulation of personal recovery goals and crisis plans. The control group received the personal recovery workbook by post. The primary outcome was readmission to acute care within 1 year. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 01027104. Findings221 participants were assigned to the intervention group versus 220 to the control group; primary outcome data were obtained for 218 versus 216. 64 (29%) of 218 participants in the intervention versus 83 (38%) of 216 in the control group were readmitted to acute care within 1 year (odds ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·43–0·99; p=0·0438). 71 serious adverse events were identified in the trial (29 in the treatment group; 42 in the control group). InterpretationOur findings suggest that peer-delivered self-management reduces readmission to acute care, although admission rates were lower than anticipated and confidence intervals were relatively wide. The complexity of the study intervention limits interpretability, but assessment is warranted of whether implementing this intervention in routine settings reduces acute care readmission. FundingNational Institute for Health Research.
机译:急性护理的背景资源支出是旨在专注于支持恢复的心理健康服务的挑战,并且在急性危机发作后复发复发。有些证据支持自我管理干预,以防止这种复发,但他们对危机之后对急性护理的再行作用的影响是未经测试的。我们测试了对同行支持工人促进的自我管理干预是否可以减少从危机决议团队排出的人的急性护理的入院率,这为危机提供了密集的家庭治疗。方法网络是一项随机控制优势试验,招募来自英格兰的六个危机决议团队的参与者。符合条件的参与者一直在危机决议团队群落,至少一周,并有能力提供知情同意。参与者通过解除的数据管理器随机分配给干预和控制组。收集和分析数据的人被屏蔽到分配,但参与者不是。干预组的参与者提供最多十届会议,同行支持工作人员支持完成个人恢复工作簿,包括制定个人恢复目标和危机计划。控制组通过邮寄收到个人恢复工作簿。主要结果是在1年内急性护理的再感染。该试验在ISRCTN注册,编号01027104.调查结果221参与者被分配给干预组对照组; 218分,对照组中的218名参与者的218名参与者的218名参与者(218名(38%)在1年内重新入院(赔率比0·66,95% CI 0·43-0·99; p = 0·0438)。在试验中确定了严重的不良事件(治疗组中的29例;在对照组中42中)。解释试探结果表明,同行交付的自我管理减少了对急性护理的再入院,尽管入学率低于预期,置信区间相对较宽。研究干预的复杂性限制了可解释性,但有必要在常规环境中实施这种干预来进行评估是否会降低急性护理入住。融资研究所。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号