首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in hematology >Cost-effectiveness analysis and the selection of blood products.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis and the selection of blood products.

机译:成本效益分析和血液制品的选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A new generation of blood components and transfusion modalities aimed at further reducing real or hypothetical risks threatening the blood supply is available. Since the risk of infection with transfusion-transmitted viruses is already very low, many of these new interventions provide a minimal health benefit at a very high cost. It is even possible that risks inherent to the new technologies themselves could surpass the current risk of transfusion-transmitted viruses. For some of the new blood components, such as leukoreduced products, the poor cost-effectiveness projections may be substantially improved if the purported health benefits are eventually proved in appropriate randomized, controlled clinical trials. Meanwhile, cost-effectiveness analyses show that allocating more resources to improve the safety of donated blood may actually decrease the overall transfusion safety by subtracting resources from other areas of the health care system, so a realignment of costs with health benefits seems necessary.
机译:旨在进一步减少威胁血液供应的真实或假设风险的新一代血液成分和输血方式已面世。由于感染输血传播病毒的风险已经非常低,因此许多新的干预措施以极高的成本提供了最小的健康益处。新技术本身固有的风险甚至有可能超过当前输血传播病毒的风险。对于某些新的血液成分,例如白细胞减少产品,如果声称的健康益处最终在适当的随机对照临床试验中得到证明,则可以大大改善不良的成本效益预测。同时,成本效益分析表明,分配更多的资源以提高献血的安全性实际上可能会通过从医疗保健系统其他领域中减去资源而实际上降低总体输血安全性,因此似乎有必要将成本与健康利益进行调整。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号