...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Associations between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
【24h】

Associations between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

机译:机器人辅助自由基前列腺切除术的医院体积与结果之间的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose:Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has become the predominant surgical modality to manage localized prostate cancer in the U.S. However, there are few studies focusing on the associations between hospital volume and outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Materials and Methods:We identified robot-assisted radical prostatectomies for clinically localized (cT1-2N0M0) prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 in the National Cancer Database. We categorized annual average hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume into very low, low, medium, high and very high by most closely sorting the final included patients into 5 equal-sized groups (quintiles). Outcomes included 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, conversion (to open), prolonged length of stay (more than 2 days), 30-day (unplanned) readmission, positive surgical margin and lymph node dissection rates.Results:A total of 114,957 patients were included in the study, and hospital volume was categorized into very low (3 to 45 cases per year), low (46 to 72), medium (73 to 113), high (114 to 218) and very high (219 or more). Overall 30-day mortality (0.12%), 90-day mortality (0.16%) and conversion rates (0.65%) were low. Multivariable logistic regressions showed that compared with the very low volume group, higher hospital volume was associated with lower odds of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.23, p <0.001 for very high), prolonged length of stay (OR 0.25, p <0.001 for very high), 30-day readmission (OR 0.53, p <0.001 for very high) and positive surgical margins (OR 0.61, p <0.001 for very high). Higher hospital volume was also associated with higher odds of lymph node dissection in the intermediate/high risk cohort (OR 3.23, p <0.001 for very high).Conclusions:Patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at higher volume hospitals are likely to have improved perioperative and superior oncologic outcomes compared to lower volume hospitals.
机译:目的:机器人辅助自由基前列腺切除术已成为在美国管理局部前列腺癌的主要手术态度,几乎没有关于机器人辅助自由基前列腺切除术的病态量和结果之间的关联。我们确定了机器人 - 在2010年至2014年在国家癌症数据库中诊断出临床局部(CT1-2N0M0)前列腺癌的自由基前列腺切除术。我们将年度平均医院辅助自由基前列腺切除术体分类为非常低,低,中,高,高,非常高,最终将患者分类成5个相等的群体(昆泰)。结果包括30天死亡率,90天死亡率,转换(开放),长期逗留时间(超过2天),30天(计划生)的阅约,阳性外科裕度和淋巴结解剖率。结果:总计114,957名患者中含有在研究中,医院量分为低(每年3至45例),低(46〜72),中等(73至113),高(114至218)和非常高( 219或更多)。总体30天死亡率(0.12%),90天死亡率(0.16%)和转化率(0.65%)低。多变量的逻辑回归显示,与体积小组相比,高等医院体积与转化率较低,转化率较低(或0.23,P <0.001非常高),延长的逗留时间(或0.25,P <0.001非常高),30天的阅览(或非常高的0.53,P <0.001)和正面手术边距(或非常高的0.61,P <0.001)。中间/高风险队列(或非常高的3.23,P <0.001的中间/高风险队列(或3.23,P <0.001)的淋巴结解剖的较高病例也与较高的病态量有关。结论:在高储蓄医院接受机器人辅助的自由基前列腺切除术的患者可能有所改善与较低储蓄医院相比,围手术期和优越的肿瘤结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号