...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, B. Condensed matter, materials, surfaces, interfaces & biophysical >Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Measurements of Four Nitroxide Probes in Supercooled Water Explained by Molecular Dynamics Simulations
【24h】

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Measurements of Four Nitroxide Probes in Supercooled Water Explained by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

机译:分子动力学模拟解释过冷水中四个硝基氧化物探针的电子顺磁共振测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of the rotational diffusion of small nitroxide probes have been demonstrated to be a powerful technique for experimentally investigating the properties of supercooled liquids, such as water. However, since only the rotational diffusion of the probe molecules is measured and EPR measurements are indirect, it is not clear what the relationship between the behavior of water and the probe molecule is. To address this, we have performed molecular dynamics simulations of four nitroxide probes in TIP4P-Ew and OPC water models to directly compare with EPR experiments and to determine the behavior of the water and the underlying microscopic coupling between the water and the probes. In all, 200 ns simulations were run for 23 temperatures between 253 and 283 K for all four probes with each water model for an aggregate of 36.8 mu s of simulation time. Simulations for both water models systematically underestimated the rotational diffusion coefficients for both water and probes, though OPC simulations were generally in better agreement with the experiments than TIP4P-Ew simulations. Despite this, when the temperature dependence of the data was fit to a power law, fit parameters for TIP4P-Ew were generally in better agreement with the experiments than OPC. For probe molecules, the singular temperature was found to be T-0 = 226.5 +/- 0.4 K from experiments, T0 = 208 +/- 2 K for OPC water, and T0 = 215 +/- 2 K for TIP4P-Ew water. While for water molecules, the singular temperature was found to be T0 = 220.3 +/- 0.2 K from experiments, T0 = 208 +/- 2 K for OPC water, and T0 = 220 +/- 1 K for TIP4P-Ew water. Systematic underestimation of the rotational diffusion coefficients was most pronounced at lower temperatures and was clearly observed in changes to the Arrhenius activation energy. Above the maximum density temperature of T-rho max = 277 K, an activation energy of E-A approximate to 16.7 kJ/mol was observed for the probes from experiments, while OPC had E-A approximate to 15.2 kJ/mol and TIP4P-Ew had E-A approximate to 14.6 kJ/mol. Below the maximum density temperature, the activation energy jumped to E-A approximate to 32.5 kJ/mol for experiments but only E-A approximate to 23 kJ/mol for OPC and E-A approximate to 22 kJ/mol for TIP4P-Ew. In all cases, we saw good agreement between the behavior of the probe molecules and water. To understand why, we calculated the average number of hydrogen bonds between the probe molecules and water. From this, we were able to explain the rotational diffusion times for all of the probes. These results show that current molecular models are sufficient to capture physical phenomena observed with EPR and to help elucidate why the probes provide accurate insights into the behavior of supercooled water.
机译:电子顺磁共振(EPR)的小氮氧探头的旋转扩散的测量已被证明是用于实验调查过冷液体,例如水的性质的强大技术。然而,由于只有探针分子的旋转扩散被测量和EPR测量是间接的,目前尚不清楚的水的行为和探针分子之间的关系是什么。为了解决这个问题,我们已经进行四个氮氧探针分子动力学模拟中TIP4P-EW和OPC水模型与EPR实验直接比较和以确定水的行为和水和探针之间的底层微观耦合。总之,200个纳秒模拟,运行253和283 K中所有4个探针,每个水模型23度之间的温度下的36.8亩S的仿真时间的集合体。模拟两种水模型系统地低估了水和探头的旋转扩散系数,虽然OPC模拟与实验比TIP4P-EW模拟更好的协议,一般是。尽管这样,当数据的温度依赖性是适合一个功法,对TIP4P-EW拟合参数一般是与实验比OPC好协议。为探针分子时,单数温度被发现是T0 = 226.5±0.4从实验K,T 0 = 208 +/- 2 K代表OPC水,和T0 = 215 +/- 2 K中TIP4P-EW水。而水分子,单数温度被发现是T0 = 220.3 +/- 0.2℃从实验中,T 0 = 208 +/- 2 K代表OPC水,和T 0 = 220 +/- 1 K中TIP4P-EW水。旋转扩散系数系统性低估最为明显在较低温度下和在改变到阿仑尼乌斯活化能清楚地观察到。上述T-RHO最大的最大密度温度= 277 K,EA的活化能近似于16.7千焦/摩尔,观察到从实验的探针,而OPC不得不EA近似于15.2千焦/摩尔和TIP4P-EW过EA近似到14.6千焦/摩尔。低于最大密度温度,活化能跃升至E-A近似到32.5千焦/摩尔进行实验,但只有E-A接近至23千焦/摩尔为OPC和E-A近似至22千焦/摩尔为TIP4P-EW。在任何情况下,我们看到了探针分子和水的行为之间良好的一致性。要理解为什么,我们计算的探针分子和水之间的氢键的平均数目。由此看来,我们能够解释旋转扩散时间的所有探测。这些结果表明,目前的分子模型足以捕捉与EPR和帮助阐明为什么探头提供准确洞察过冷水行为观察物理现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号