...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology >Demonstrating the importance of using total time balance instead of route balance on a multi-objective vehicle routing problem with time windows
【24h】

Demonstrating the importance of using total time balance instead of route balance on a multi-objective vehicle routing problem with time windows

机译:展示在多目标车道路由问题上使用总时间平衡而展示使用总时间平衡的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

'Route balance' is the difference between the longest and the shortest among all the route lengths. The route balance is frequently considered in a vehicle routing problem (VRP) for balancing the distance travelled among delivery vehicles. This is a common practice since in VRPs there are no time elements. However, in recent years, some research works have considered route balance in a vehicle routing problem with time windows (VRPTW). As there are more time elements in VRPTW, this paper refutes that route balance is sufficient for VRPTW by simultaneously optimising makespan and workload imbalance using 'total time balance' instead of route balance. On the other hand, 'total time balance' is the difference between the longest total time taken and the shortest total time taken among delivery vehicles. As such, makespan is the longest total time taken among vehicles. Total time taken for a vehicle is the sum of vehicle run time, waiting time and service time. In order to demonstrate the importance of using total time balance instead of route balance on VRPTW, three different multi-objective VRPTW models, namely, (1) only with general VRPTW objectives (i.e. 'total distance travelled' by all vehicles and 'total number of vehicles' used). (2) general VRPTW objectives with route balance and (3) general VRPTW objectives with total time balance are developed and solved by fitness aggregated genetic algorithm (FAGA) for 36 Solomon's benchmark instances. By comparison of the makespan produced by the FAGA between the three cases, the importance of using total time balance instead of route balance on multi-objective VRPTW is demonstrated. Also, the makespan produced by the FAGA for the third case, i.e. general VRPTW objectives with total time balance is compared with the makespan produced by fitness aggregated differential evolution (FADE). By comparing makespan with statistical testing between FAGA and FADE, the outperformance of FAGA over FADE is verified. To check the practicality of the total time balance on multi-objective VRPTW, an instance with real time windows is also solved for the three cases by the FAGA and its makespan are compared and reported.
机译:“路径平衡”是所有路线长度中最长和最短的差异。路线余额经常考虑在车辆路由问题(VRP)中,以平衡在送货车辆之间行驶的距离。这是一个常见的做法,因为在VRP中没有时间元素。然而,近年来,一些研究作品在Windows Windows(VRPTW)的车辆路由问题中都考虑了路线平衡。由于VRPTW中有更多的时间元素,本文通过使用“总时间余额”而不是路径平衡,通过同时优化Makespan和工作负载不平衡,驳斥路径余额足以进行VRPTW。另一方面,“总时间平衡”是所花费最长的总时间与送货车辆中最短的总时间之间的区别。因此,Mepespan是车辆中最长的总时间。车辆的总时间是车辆运行时间,等待时间和服务时间的总和。为了证明使用总时间平衡而不是在VRPTW上使用总时间平衡,三种不同的多目标VRPTW模型,即(1)只有一般VRPTW目标(即所有车辆的“总距离”和“总数”)车辆的车辆。 (2)航线的平衡和(3)的总时间一般均衡VRPTW目标一般VRPTW目标是开发和健身解决聚集了36种所罗门的基准情况下,遗传算法(FAGA)。通过比较FAGA在三种情况下产生的MEPESPHAN,证明了使用总时间平衡而不是在多目标VRPTW上使用总时间平衡的重要性。此外,由FAGA生产的第三种情况的MEPESPHAN,即将总时间平衡的一般VRPTW目标与健身聚集差分进化(褪色)产生的MEPESPHAN进行比较。通过将Mapspan与FAGA之间的统计测试进行比较,验证了FAGA过淡出的表现。要检查多目标VRPT上的总时间平衡的实用性,还可以解决一个实时窗口的实例,在FAGA及其Mapespan进行了比较和报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号