【24h】

Discussion of seismicity near Jaitapur

机译:关于贾塔普尔附近地震活动的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We thank Rastogi 1 for pointing out a number of factual errors in our article 2 , and welcome this opportunity to correct several scientific misunderstandings that have crept into his manuscript. Rastogi is in agreement with our statements and conclusions concerning the seismicity in the Jaitapur region that: (a) no significant M > 6 earthquakes have been recorded by seismographs located within 50 km of Jaitapur, and no historical reports of intense shaking can be attributed to such earthquakes near Jaitapur, and (b) shaking intensity from distant historical earthquakes has not exceeded MSK Intensity VI. We conclude, as we assume Rastogi does, that these observations do not place a reliable upper bound on shaking due to future seismicity in the Jaitapur region. This was the thrust of our article. Some of Rastogi’s comments are easily addressed with minor corrections or clarifications, but his main counterargument requires a more thorough analysis. We provide the former first.
机译:我们感谢拉斯托吉1在我们的文章2中指出了一些事实错误,并欢迎有此机会纠正他的手稿中出现的一些科学误解。 Rastogi同意我们有关Jaitapur地区地震活动的陈述和结论,即:(a)Jaitapur 50公里以内的地震仪未记录到M> 6大地震,也没有归因于强烈震动的历史报道(b)来自遥远的历史地震的震动强度未超过MSK强度VI。我们得出结论,正如我们假设Rastogi所做的那样,由于Jaitapur地区未来的地震活动,这些观测结果并不能为摇动设置可靠的上限。这是我们文章的重点。只需稍作更正或澄清,即可轻松解决Rastogi的某些评论,但他的主要反对意见需要进行更彻底的分析。我们先提供前者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号