首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Biotechnology: An answer to alternatives for animal model testings
【24h】

Biotechnology: An answer to alternatives for animal model testings

机译:生物技术:动物模型测试替代方案的答案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Following Peter Singer's version of Animal Liberation and the movement of animal rights activists, there has been a resurgence of new and alternate testing procedures for toxicological evaluation. Scientists and researchers have long been involved in the search of alternate testing methods; however, the regulatory toxicologists, FDA and EPA of several countries do not accept in vitro methods as a substitute for safety tests or alternate methods. This is because the new products are for human consumption. Extrapolating the in vitro methods to animal models is therefore not always acceptable. This review discusses issues raised by activists and the available scientific technologies which could serve as alternate methods for toxicological evaluation.
机译:继彼得·辛格(Peter Singer)发表《动物解放》(Animal Liberation)版本和动物权利活动家运动之后,出现了新的和替代的毒理学评估测试程序。科学家和研究人员长期以来一直在寻找其他测试方法。但是,一些国家的监管毒理学家,FDA和EPA不接受体外方法替代安全性测试或替代方法。这是因为新产品供人类消费。因此,将体外方法外推到动物模型并不总是可以接受的。这篇评论讨论了维权人士提出的问题以及可以用作毒理学评估替代方法的可用科学技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号