首页> 外文期刊>Physica, A. Statistical mechanics and its applications >Which one is more informative in determining price movements of hedging assets? Evidence from Bitcoin, gold and crude oil markets
【24h】

Which one is more informative in determining price movements of hedging assets? Evidence from Bitcoin, gold and crude oil markets

机译:哪一个在确定套期保值资产的价格变动方面更有信息量? 来自比特币,黄金和原油市场的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we aim to identify which one is more informative in determining the price fluctuations in a system consisting of three commonly used hedging assets, i.e. Bitcoin, gold and crude oil. Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis (MF-DCCA), multivariate GARCH (MVGARCH) and information share (IS) analysis are utilized to achieve this purpose. The empirical results show that, firstly the MF-DCCA suggests that obvious multifractality exists in the cross-correlations among the three hedging assets and Bitcoin is more susceptible to price fluctuations from gold and crude oil markets. Secondly the results from DCC-MVGARCH model indicate that, although significant volatility spillovers are detected among the three assets, the spillover effects from gold and crude oil markets to Bitcoin market are much stronger than other spillovers. Additionally, the dynamic correlations between gold and crude oil markets are almost positive, while those between Bitcoin and gold, and those between Bitcoin and oil markets are nearly negative during the whole sample periods. Finally, the information share analysis further confirms that gold market dominates crude oil and Bitcoin markets in absorbing new information and contributes more explanatory power in price movements/variance of the hedging assets system. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
机译:在本文中,我们旨在确定哪一个更有信息,在确定由三种常用的套期保值资产组成的系统中的价格波动,即比特币,金和原油。利用多变量的互相关分析(MF-DCCA),多变量GARCH(MVGARCH)和信息共享(IS)分析来实现此目的。经验结果表明,首先,MF-DCCA表明,三个套期保值资产和比特币之间的互联网中存在明显的多重性,比黄金和原油市场的价格波动更容易受到影响。其次,来自DCC-MVGARCH模型的结果表明,尽管在三个资产中检测到显着的波动性溢出,但黄金和原油市场对比特币市场的溢出效应比其他溢出效应强。此外,黄金与原油市场之间的动态相关性几乎是阳性的,而比特币和金之间的那些,比特币和石油市场之间的那些在整个样本期间几乎是阴性的。最后,信息份额分析进一步证实,黄金市场在吸收新信息中的原油和比特币市场中占据了原油和比特币市场,并为套期保值资产制度的价格走势/方差作出了更大的解释力。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号