...
首页> 外文期刊>Physica, A. Statistical mechanics and its applications >Long deliberation times promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
【24h】

Long deliberation times promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game

机译:较长的审议时间促进囚犯困境游戏中的合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Some individuals could be quite cautious when making decisions and do not update their strategy frequently in the prisoner's dilemma game. That is, instead of updating their strategy immediately after the game, they make decisions only after a certain period of deliberation. Moreover, individuals' strategy update is based on the cumulative payoffs they got from their prior update. Since individuals in a group could be homogeneous or heterogeneous, their strategy can depend on two aspects: the initial time of the update and the length of its delay time. In this paper, three different cases that may lead to the delay of strategy update are taken into consideration. We find that introducing a deliberation mechanism can promote cooperation, that this effect could be greater when the delay time is extended, and that heterogeneity among individuals also has a positive effect on cooperation. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在做出决定时,一些人可能会非常谨慎,并且不会在囚犯的困境游戏中经常更新他们的策略。 也就是说,而不是在游戏之后立即更新他们的策略,而是在一定的审议期后立即做出决定。 此外,个人的战略更新是基于他们先前更新的累积收益。 由于组中的个体可以是同质或异构的,因此它们的策略可以取决于两个方面:更新的初始时间和其延迟时间的长度。 在本文中,考虑了可能导致策略更新延迟的三种不同案例。 我们发现,介绍审议机制可以促进合作,当延迟时间延长时,这种效果可能会更大,并且个人之间的异质性也对合作产生了积极影响。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号