首页> 外文期刊>Physica, A. Statistical mechanics and its applications >Analysis of emergency evacuation in an offshore platform using evacuation simulation modeling
【24h】

Analysis of emergency evacuation in an offshore platform using evacuation simulation modeling

机译:利用疏散仿真建模分析海上平台紧急疏散

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The evacuation routes which are selected by crew will affect their evacuation efficiency when an offshore platform under emergency conditions. To quantify the influence of evacuation route selection on crew evacuation efficiency, two scenarios are considered: Scenario 1 is that crew independently select the evacuation routes to evacuate to the assembling point, Scenario 2 is that crew evacuate to the assembling point in accordance with the prescribed evacuation routes. The evacuation efficiency of these two evacuation scenarios is analyzed and discussed from the aspect of evacuation time, waiting time index (WTI), optimal performance statistic (OPS), mean non-flow statistic (MNS) and casualty, respectively. It is found that the evacuation time of crew in Scenario 1 reaches 255.09 s, but Scenario 2 is 32.84 s shorter. By analyzing the WTI of each evacuation exit in these two evacuation scenarios, a large number of people in Scenario 1 are congested at the exit 1, which is the main reason for the increase of evacuation time of Scenario 1. Moreover, the comparison of the OPS and MNS of these two evacuation scenarios indicates that crew in Scenario 1 have not made full use of evacuation exit resources and make it impossible for crew to reach the assembling points timely. Furthermore, in Scenario 1, there are ten crew unable to reach the primary assembling point in time. Scenario 2, however, suffers no casualties. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这些船员选择了撤离路线,会影响他们的排气效率在紧急情况下,当一个海上平台。为了量化疏散路线选择对乘员排气效率的影响,两种情况都被认为:方案1是,船员独立地选择的疏散路线疏散到组装点,情形2是船员撤离到组装点按照规定的疏散通道。这两种情形抽空的抽空效率进行分析,并从疏散时间方面所讨论的,等待时间分别指数(WTI),最佳的性能统计(OPS),平均不流动统计量(MNS)和伤亡。据发现,船员的方案1个中达到255.09 S,但方案2所述的排放时间为32.84比较短。通过分析这两种疏散情形每个疏散出口的WTI,在方案1的大量人在出口1,其是用于方案1中。此外,对所述比较的排空时间的增加的主要原因拥塞OPS和这两个疏散场景MNS表示方案1船员都没有充分利用疏散出口的资源,使其无法船员及时到达装配点。此外,在方案1中,有10船员无法及时到达主拼接点。方案2,然而,遭受无人员伤亡。 (c)2018年elestvier b.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号