首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >A comparative study of information retrieval in grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging
【24h】

A comparative study of information retrieval in grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging

机译:基于光栅的X射线相位对比度成像信息检索的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The cosine-model analysis (CMA) method and the small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) method are two major types of information retrieval algorithms, commonly utilized in x-ray phase-contrast imaging with a grating interferometer. However, there are significant differences between the two methods in algorithm implementation, and the existing literature has not completely revealed their intrinsic relationship. In this paper, we theoretically derive and experimentally verify the intrinsic connections between CMA and SAXS, and it is seen that SAXS can be interpreted well by the cosine-model assumption of CMA. To validate our analysis of the scattering distribution when applying the cosine model to the convolution used in SAXS, we applied a deconvolution process into CMA before using the Fourier transform to get the three contrasts. Furthermore, the principal component analysis (PCA) is introduced in this work, and two PCA-based retrieval algorithms are presented in order to simplify the iteration process of deconvolution in SAXS or to obtain absorption and dark-field signals instead of the Fourier transform in CMA. Applying a quantitative structural similarity (SSIM) index and a profile analysis to the results of an ex vivo mammography, it is proved that retrieved images via CMA and SAXS are consistent with each other (SSIM values are 1.0000, 0.9845 and 0.9767 respectively), and that the extra deconvolution process applied into CMA shows a good performance and our analytical analysis of the scattering distribution is valid when applying the cosine model to the convolution used in SAXS. Besides, it is concluded that PCA shows almost the same performance with the Fourier transform (SSIM values are 1.0000 for both absorption and dark-field images), and the simplified SAXS-analogous method works well with higher efficiency in computation and better stability relative to the original SAXS, while maintaining the similar level of image quality (SSIM values are 1.0000, 0.9839 and 0.9781 respectively).
机译:余弦模型分析(CMA)方法和小角度X射线散射(SAXS)方法是两种主要类型的信息检索算法,通常用于具有光栅干涉仪的X射线相位对比度成像。然而,算法实施中的两种方法之间存在显着差异,并且现有文献并未完全揭示其内在关系。在本文中,我们理论上源自和实验验证CMA和萨克斯之间的内在连接,并且可以看出,通过CMA的余弦模型假设可以很好地解释萨克斯。为了在将余弦模型应用于萨克斯中使用的卷积时验证我们对散射分配的分析,我们在使用傅里叶变换之前将解构过程应用于CMA,以获得三个对比度。此外,在该工作中介绍了主成分分析(PCA),并提出了两个基于PCA的检索算法,以简化萨克斯中的解卷积的迭代过程或获得吸收和暗场信号而不是傅立叶变换CMA。将定量结构相似性(SSIM)指数和简档分析应用于前体内乳房X线照相术的结果,证明了通过CMA和SAXS检索的图像彼此一致(SSIM值分别为1.0000,0.9845和0.9767),以及施加到CMA中的额外折垃圾过程显示出良好的性能,并且在将余弦模型应用于萨克斯中使用的卷积时,对散射分配的分析分析是有效的。此外,得出结论,PCA与傅里叶变换(SSIM值为1.0000,吸收和暗场图像的SSIM值),简化的萨克斯 - 类似方法具有更高的计算和相对于稳定性更高的效率原始萨克斯,同时保持类似水平的图像质量(SSIM值分别为1.0000,0.9839和0.9781)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号