...
首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams
【24h】

An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams

机译:用于计算扁平滤波器的幻像散射因子的分析形式,无施加滤波器(FFF)模式光子束

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Phantom Scatter Factors, Sp in the Khan formalism (Khan et al 1980 J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 6 745-51) describe medium-induced changes in photon-beam intensity as a function of size of the beam. According to the British Journal of Radiology, Supplement 25, megavoltage phantom scatter factors are invariant as a function of photon-beam energy. However, during the commissioning of an accelerator with flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams (Varian TrueBeamTM 6-MV FFF and 10-MV FFF), differences were noted in phantom scatter between the filtered beams and FFF-mode beams. The purpose of this work was to evaluate this difference and provide an analytical formalism to explain the phantom scatter differences between FFF-mode and the filtered mode. An analytical formalism was devised to demonstrate the source of phantom scatter differences between the filtered and the FFF-mode beams. The reason for the differences in the phantom scatter factors between the filtered and the FFF-mode beams is hypothesized to be the non-uniform beam profiles of the FFF-mode beams. The analytical formalism proposed here is based on this idea, taking the product of the filtered phantom scatter factors and the ratio of the off-axis ratio between the FFF-mode and the filtered beams. All measurements were performed using a Varian TrueBeamTM linear accelerator with photon energies of 6-MV and 10-MV in both filtered and FFF-modes. For all measurements, a PTW Farmer type chamber and a Scanditronix CC04 cylindrical ionization were used. The in-water measurements were made at depth dose maximum and 100 cm source-to-axis distance. The in-air measurements were done at 100 cm source-to-axis distance with appropriate build-up cap. From these measurements, the phantom scatter factors were derived for the filtered beams and the FFF-mode beams for both energies to be evaluated against the phantoms scatter factors calculated using the proposed algorithm. For 6-MV, the difference between the measured and the calculated FFF-mode phantom scatter factors ranged from -0.34% to 0.73%. The average per cent difference was -0.17% (1σ = 0.25%). For 10-MV, the difference ranged from -0.19% to 0.24%. The average per cent difference was -0.17% (1σ = 0.13%). An analytical formalism was presented to calculate the phantom scatter factors for FFF-mode beams using filtered phantom scatter factors as a basis. The overall differences between measurements and calculations were within ±0.5% for 6-MV and ±0.25% for 10-MV.
机译:幻影分散系数,SP在汗形式主义(Khan等人1980年J. Radiat。ONCOL生物学杂志物理学6 745-51)描述了在光子束强度介质诱导的变化的光束的大小的函数。据英国放射学杂志,补编25的兆伏幻象散射因素是不变的光子束能量的功能。然而,加速器的与平坦滤波器免费的试运行期间(FFF)光子束(瓦里安TrueBeamTM 6-MV FFF和10-MV FFF),差异在过滤梁和FFF模式梁之间幻象散射指出。这项工作的目的是评估这种差异,并提供一种分析形式主义解释FFF模式和滤波方式之间的幻象散射差异。分析形式主义被设计来证明的过滤,将FFF模式梁之间幻象散射差异的来源。其原因在过滤并FFF模式光束之间的幻象散射因素的差异被假设为是的FFF模式光束非均匀的光束轮廓。这里提出的分析形式主义基于这一想法,取过滤幻象散射因素的产物和FFF模式和过滤光束之间的离轴比的比率。使用具有在两个过滤并FFF-模式6-MV和10-MV的光子能量的Varian TrueBeamTM线性加速器进行所有的测量。对于所有的测量,一个PTW农民型室和Scanditronix CC04圆柱形电离使用。的水测量在深度剂量最大和100厘米源到轴的距离制成。中空气测量以100cm源至轴线的距离与适当的增盖完成的。从这些测量中,体模散射因素源自于经滤波的光束和所述FFF模式波束用于向针对使用所提出的算法计算出的体模散射因素来评估两者的能量。对于6-MV,测量的和所计算的FFF模式幻象散射因素范围从-0.34%至0.73%之间的差。 %的差平均为-0.17%(1σ= 0.25%)。对于10-MV,差异介于-0.19%至0.24%。 %的差平均为-0.17%(1σ= 0.13%)。分析形式主义被提出,以计算假想散射因素FFF模式波束使用过滤幻象散射因素为基础。测量和计算之间的总体差异±0.5%的范围内进行6-MV和10-MV±0.25%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号