...
首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams
【24h】

An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams

机译:一种分析形式主义,用于计算用于使无滤波器(FFF)模式的光子光束展平的幻影散射因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Phantom Scatter Factors, Sp in the Khan formalism (Khan et al 1980 J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 6 745-51) describe medium-induced changes in photon-beam intensity as a function of size of the beam. According to the British Journal of Radiology, Supplement 25, megavoltage phantom scatter factors are invariant as a function of photon-beam energy. However, during the commissioning of an accelerator with flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams (Varian TrueBeamTM 6-MV FFF and 10-MV FFF), differences were noted in phantom scatter between the filtered beams and FFF-mode beams. The purpose of this work was to evaluate this difference and provide an analytical formalism to explain the phantom scatter differences between FFF-mode and the filtered mode. An analytical formalism was devised to demonstrate the source of phantom scatter differences between the filtered and the FFF-mode beams. The reason for the differences in the phantom scatter factors between the filtered and the FFF-mode beams is hypothesized to be the non-uniform beam profiles of the FFF-mode beams. The analytical formalism proposed here is based on this idea, taking the product of the filtered phantom scatter factors and the ratio of the off-axis ratio between the FFF-mode and the filtered beams. All measurements were performed using a Varian TrueBeamTM linear accelerator with photon energies of 6-MV and 10-MV in both filtered and FFF-modes. For all measurements, a PTW Farmer type chamber and a Scanditronix CC04 cylindrical ionization were used. The in-water measurements were made at depth dose maximum and 100 cm source-to-axis distance. The in-air measurements were done at 100 cm source-to-axis distance with appropriate build-up cap. From these measurements, the phantom scatter factors were derived for the filtered beams and the FFF-mode beams for both energies to be evaluated against the phantoms scatter factors calculated using the proposed algorithm. For 6-MV, the difference between the measured and the calculated FFF-mode phantom scatter factors ranged from -0.34% to 0.73%. The average per cent difference was -0.17% (1σ = 0.25%). For 10-MV, the difference ranged from -0.19% to 0.24%. The average per cent difference was -0.17% (1σ = 0.13%). An analytical formalism was presented to calculate the phantom scatter factors for FFF-mode beams using filtered phantom scatter factors as a basis. The overall differences between measurements and calculations were within ±0.5% for 6-MV and ±0.25% for 10-MV.
机译:Khan形式主义中的幻影散射因子Sp(Khan et al。1980 J. Radiat。Oncol。Biol。Phys。6 745-51)描述了光子束强度的介质诱导变化,它是光束大小的函数。根据英国放射学杂志增刊25,兆伏幻像散射因子是不变的,随光子束能量而变。但是,在调试具有平坦无滤波器(FFF)光子束(Varian TrueBeamTM 6-MV FFF和10-MV FFF)的加速器时,在滤波后的光束和FFF模式的光束之间的幻影散射中发现了差异。这项工作的目的是评估这种差异,并提供一种分析形式主义来解释FFF模式和滤波模式之间的幻影散射差异。设计了一种分析形式论来证明滤光和FFF模式光束之间幻像散射差异的根源。假定滤波后的光束与FFF模式的光束之间的幻像散射因子不同的原因是FFF模式的光束的光束分布不均匀。此处提出的分析形式主义是基于这一思想的,它采用了滤波后的幻像散射因子与FFF模式与滤波后的光束之间的离轴比之比。所有测量均使用Varian TrueBeamTM线性加速器在滤波和FFF模式下进行,光子能量分别为6-MV和10-MV。对于所有测量,均使用PTW Farmer型反应室和Scanditronix CC04圆柱电离仪。水中测量是在最大深度剂量和100 cm源轴距离下进行的。空气中的测量是在源到轴距离为100 cm的情况下,使用适当的堆积帽进行的。从这些测量中,导出了针对两种能量的滤波光束和FFF模式光束的幻影散射因子,以针对使用所提出算法计算的幻影散射因子进行评估。对于6-MV,测得的FFF模式幻像散射因子与计算出的FFF模式幻像散射因子之间的差异范围为-0.34%至0.73%。平均百分比差异为-0.17%(1σ= 0.25%)。对于10-MV,差异范围为-0.19%至0.24%。平均百分比差异为-0.17%(1σ= 0.13%)。提出了一种分析形式主义,以滤波后的幻影散射因子为基础来计算FFF模式光束的幻影散射因子。对于6-MV,测量和计算之间的总体差异在±0.5%以内,对于10-MV,其总体差异在±0.25%之内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号