...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric blood & cancer >Evaluation of aprepitant for acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving high‐dose methotrexate
【24h】

Evaluation of aprepitant for acute chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving high‐dose methotrexate

机译:评价急性化疗诱导的恶心,急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童和青少年呕吐的评价,接受高剂量甲氨蝶呤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Background Chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. The emetogenicity of high‐dose methotrexate in children and adolescents with cancer is incompletely characterized. At our institution, a number of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have received aprepitant with courses of high‐dose methotrexate after poor CINV control with prior courses. Procedure We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis on patients with ALL who received methotrexate 5 g/m 2 /dose with and without concomitant aprepitant at Texas. Children's Hospital between October 1, 2010 and January 31, 2016. Results We identified 16 patients who received a total of 69 courses of methotrexate. An enhanced antiemetic regimen containing aprepitant was administered with 42 methotrexate courses and resulted in a 54% reduction in the use of as‐needed antiemetics ( P ?=?0.002, 95% CI: 21–89%). There were no statistically significant differences in methotrexate area under the curve values (2,209 μM?hr/l ± 151?vs. 2,051 μM?hr/l ± 94, P ?=?0.355) or end‐infusion methotrexate concentrations (80.5 μM ± 5.6?vs. 74.7 μM ± 3.2, P ?=?0.335) in patients receiving a standard versus an enhanced antiemetic regimen. Conclusions The addition of aprepitant reduces both CINV and the use of rescue antiemetics. Aprepitant does not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate. Granisetron was prescribed more frequently than ondansetron, but selection of secondary and tertiary agents, if any, was highly variable.
机译:摘要背景化疗诱导的恶心和呕吐(CINV)对患者的生活质量产生负面影响。患有癌症儿童和青少年的高剂量甲氨蝶呤的均匀性是不完全的。在我们的机构,许多急性淋巴细胞白血病患者(All)在与现有课程的差的Cinv控制后,在高剂量甲氨蝶呤疗程中获得了4.术。程序我们对患有甲氨蝶呤5g / m 2 /剂量的患者进行了回顾性的队列分析,而不伴随着德克萨斯州。 2010年10月1日至2016年1月31日之间的儿童医院。结果我们确定了16名接受了69次甲氨蝶呤课程的患者。含有42个甲氨蝶呤疗程的增强的止吐抑制方案施用42个甲氨蝶呤疗程,导致使用止吐剂的使用减少了54%(P?= 0.002,95%CI:21-89%)。曲线值下的甲氨蝶呤面积没有统计学上显着的差异(2,209μm?Hr / L±151?与。2,051μm≤hr/ l±94,p?= 0.355)或末端输注甲氨蝶呤浓度(80.5μm± 5.6?vs.74.7μm±3.2,p?= 0.335)接受标准与增强的止吐方案。结论添加剂的添加减少了CINV和救援助剂的使用。共用似乎不会影响甲氨蝶呤的药代动力学。 Granisetron比ondansetron更频繁地规定,但选择二级和叔药剂(如果有的话)是高度可变的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号