...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Laparoscopic approach for left-sided T4 colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure, compared to open surgery
【24h】

Laparoscopic approach for left-sided T4 colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure, compared to open surgery

机译:与开放手术相比,左侧左侧T4结肠癌的腹腔镜方法是一种安全可行的程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background A laparoscopic approach can be attempted for pathologic T4 (pT4) colon cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the clinico-oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic versus open surgery for right and left-sided pT4 colon cancer. Methods From a multicentric collaborative database, we enrolled 245 patients with right-sided colon cancer (RCC, 128 laparoscopy and 117 open) and 338 with left-sided colon cancer (LCC, 176 laparoscopy and 162 open). All patients underwent intended curative surgery for histologically proven T4 adenocarcinoma, between 2004 and 2013. The primary end-point of our analysis was the oncologic outcome, including the 5-year disease-free survival (5 year-DFS) and the 5-year overall survival (5 year-OS). The secondary end-points included the R0 resection rate and postoperative complications. Results Our study group included 224 T4N0 and 359 T4N+ tumors. The median follow-up was 53 months. For patients with RCC, the rate of postoperative morbidities was lower for the laparoscopy than that for the open surgery group (12.5 vs. 22.2%, p = 0.044). There was no difference in the R0 resection rate (94.5 vs. 96.6%, p = 0.425) between the groups. The 5 year-DFS and 5 year-OS rates were lower for the laparoscopy than that in the open group (48.9% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.093; 60.0% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.284, respectively), but this difference was not statistically significant. Among patients with LCC, there were no differences in the rate of postoperative complication and R0 resection (15.3 vs. 21.0%, p = 0.307; 96.0 vs. 95.7%, p = 0.875, respectively). Both groups had comparable 5 year-DFS and 5 year-OS rates (62.7% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.552; 72.0% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.611, respectively). Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery appears to be a safe procedure for patients with pT4 LCC, but requires careful consideration for patients with pT4 RCC.
机译:背景技术可以尝试对病理T4(PT4)结肠癌进行腹腔镜方法。我们的目标是评估腹腔镜与左侧和左侧PT4结肠癌开放手术后的临床肿瘤结果。方法来自多中心协同数据库,我们注册了245例右侧结肠癌(RCC,128腹镜检查和117个开放)和338例左侧结肠癌(LCC,176腹镜检查和162个开放)。所有患者均在2004年至2013年期间接受了针对组织学证明T4腺癌的预期疗法。我们分析的主要终点是肿瘤生理结果,包括5年的无病生存(5年度DFS)和5年整体生存(5年OS)。次要终点包括R0切除率和术后并发症。结果我们的研究组包括224吨T4N0和359 T4N +肿瘤。中位后续时间为53个月。对于RCC患者,腹腔镜检查的术后病理率低于开放手术组的速率(12.5 vs.2.2%,P = 0.044)。 r0切除率没有差异(94.5与96.6%,P = 0.425)之间的差异。腹腔镜的5年DFS和5年OS率低于开放组(48.9%与59.2%,P = 0.093; 60.0%与70.0%,P = 0.284),但这差异没有统计学意义。在LCC患者中,术后并发症和R0切除率没有差异(15.3与21.0%,P = 0.307; 96.0分别,P = 0.875分别)。两组两组可比5年DF和5年 - OS速率(62.7%对61.1%,P = 0.552; 72.0%,分别为72.0%,P = 0.611)。结论腹腔镜手术似乎是PT4 LCC患者的安全程序,但需要仔细考虑PT4 RCC患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号