首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study

机译:腹腔镜胆囊切除术和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术在急性顺利胆囊炎中的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background In elderly patients with calculous acute cholecystitis, the risk of emergency surgery is high, and percutaneous cholecystostomy tube drainage (PC) combined with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) may be a good choice. We retrospectively compared laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to DLC after PC to determine which is the better treatment strategy. Method We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 752 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Patients with the following conditions were included: (1) age > 65 years old; (2) patients with a grade 2 or 3 severity of cholecystitis according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13); (3) the surgeons who performed the LC were professors or associate professors and (4) the DLC was performed in our hospital after PC. Patients who missed their 30-day follow-up; were diagnosed with bile duct stones, cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis or were pregnant were excluded from the study. A total of 51 of 314 patients who underwent LC and 73 of 438 patients who underwent PC + DLC were assessed. PC + DLC and LC patients were matched by cholecystitis severity grade according to the TG13, and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator was used to predict mortality (n = 21/group). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analysed. Results Compared to the matched LC group, the DLC group had less intraoperative bleeding (42.2 vs 75.3 mL,p = 0.014), shorter hospital stays (4.9 vs 7.4 days,p = 0.010) and lower rates of type A bile duct injury (4.8% vs 14.3%,p = 0.035) and type D (0 vs 9.5%,p = 0.002) according to Strasberg classification, residual stones (4.8 vs 14.3%,p = 0.035) and gastrointestinal organ injury (0 vs 3.6%,p < 0.001). Patients in the DLC group had lower incidences of ICU admission and death and a significantly lower incidence of repeat surgery. Conclusion In elderly patients treated for acute calculous cholecystitis, the 30-day mortality and complication rates were lower for PC + DLC than for LC. However, the total hospitalisation time was significantly prolonged and the costs were significantly higher for PC + DLC.
机译:背景老年患者的结石急性胆囊炎,急诊手术的风险高,经皮胆囊管引流(PC)与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术(DLC)相结合可能是一个不错的选择。我们回顾性地将腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与PC之后与DLC进行了比较,以确定哪个是更好的治疗策略。方法我们对752例急性光滑胆囊炎患者进行了回顾性队列分析。患有以下条件的患者包括:(1)年龄> 65岁; (2)根据2013年东京指南(TG13),胆囊炎等级或3级严重程度的患者; (3)执行LC的外科医生是教授或副教授,(4)DLC在PC后在我们的医院进行。错过了30天的随访的患者;被诊断患有胆管石,胆管炎或胆石胰腺炎或被怀孕被排除在研究之外。评估了314例接受了438名接受PC + DLC患者的314名患者的51名患者。根据TG13,PC + DLC和LC患者通过胆囊炎严重程度等级匹配,国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)计算器用于预测死亡率(n = 21 /组)。分析了术前特征和术后结果。结果与匹配的LC组相比,DLC组术中出血较少(42.2 vs 75.3ml,P = 0.014),较短的医院住宿(4.9 Vs 7.4天,P = 0.010)和叶管损伤的较低速率(4.8根据绞伤分类,残留石(4.8与14.3%,P = 0.035)和胃肠器官损伤(0 vs.8.3%,p = 0.035)和胃肠器官损伤(0 vs.9.5%,p = 0.002),型D(0与9.5%,p = 0.002)(0 vs.3.6%,p <0.001)。 DLC组的患者患有ICU入学和死亡的发病率较低,重复手术的发生率显着降低。结论在老年患者治疗急性光滑胆囊炎,PC + DLC的30天死亡率和并发症率比LC较低。但是,总住院时间明显延长,PC + DLC的成本明显高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号