...
首页> 外文期刊>Spectrochimica acta, Part A. Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy >Identifying non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) using deep learning methods with hyperspectral microscope images
【24h】

Identifying non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) using deep learning methods with hyperspectral microscope images

机译:使用具有高光谱显微镜图像的深度学习方法识别非O157滋生毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups such as O26, O45, O103, O111, O121 and O145 often cause illness to people in the United States and the conventional identification of these "Big-Six" are complex. The label-free hyperspectral microscope imaging (HMI) method, which provides spectral "fingerprints" information of bacterial cells, was employed to classify serogroups at the cellular level. In spectral analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) method and stacked auto-encoder (SAE) method were conducted to extract principal spectral features for classification task. Based on these features, multiple classifiers including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM) and soft-max regression (SR) methods were evaluated. Different sizes of datasets were also tested in search for the suitable classification models. Among the results, SAE-based classification models performed better than PCA-based models, achieving classification accuracy of SAE-LDA (93.5%), SAE-SVM (94.9%) and SAE-SR (94.6%), respectively. In contrast, classification results of PCA-based methods such as PCA-LDA, PCA-SVM and PCA-SR were only 75.5%, 85.7% and 77.1%, respectively. The results also suggested the increasing number of training samples have positive effects on classification models. Taking advantage of increasing dataset, the SAE-SR classification model finally performed better than others with average accuracy of 94.9% in classifying STEC serogroups. Specifically, O103 serogroup was classified with the highest accuracy of 97.4%, followed by O111 (96.5%), O26 (95.3%), O121 (95%), O145 (92.9%) and O45 (92.4%), respectively. Thus, the HMI technology coupled with SAE-SR classification model has the potential for "Big-Six" identification. (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:诸如O26,O45,O103,O111,O121和O145之类的非O157毒素生产的大肠杆菌(STEC)血清组经常导致美国人员造成疾病,并且传统的鉴定这些“大六”是复杂的。使用可标记的高光谱显微镜成像(HMI)方法,其提供细菌细胞的光谱“指纹”信息,用于在细胞水平处对血清组进行分类。在光谱分析中,进行主成分分析(PCA)方法和堆叠自动编码器(SAE)方法以提取分类任务的主要光谱特征。基于这些特征,评估了包括线性判别分析(LDA),支持向量机(SVM)和软质量回归(SR)方法的多种分类器。在寻找合适的分类模型中也测试了不同大小的数据集。在结果中,基于SAE的分类模型比基于PCA的模型更好,分别实现SAE-LDA(93.5%),SAE-SVM(94.9%)和SAE-SR(94.6%)的分类精度。相比之下,PCA基方法如PCA-LDA,PCA-SVM和PCA-SR的分类结果分别仅为75.5%,85.7%和77.1%。结果还建议越来越多的训练样本对分类模型具有积极影响。利用越来越多的数据集,SAE-SR分类模型最终表现优于分类STEC Serogroups的平均精度的平均精度为94.9%。具体地,O103血清组分为97.4%的最高精度,其次是O111(96.5%),O 2 6(95.3%),O121(95%),O145(92.9%)和O45(92.4%)。因此,与SAE-SR分类模型耦合的HMI技术具有“大六”识别的可能性。 (c)2019年由elestvier b.v发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号