首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Minimum Three-year Follow-up of Specific Functional Disabilities After Multilevel Lumbar Fusion Comparison of Long-level and Short-level Fusion
【24h】

Minimum Three-year Follow-up of Specific Functional Disabilities After Multilevel Lumbar Fusion Comparison of Long-level and Short-level Fusion

机译:多级腰椎融合比较长级和短级融合后的特定功能障碍的最低三年后续

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Study Design. Retrospective case-control study. Objective. To evaluate specific functional disabilities after short- and long-level lumbar fusion. Summary of Background Data. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) cannot represent all types of functional disabilities observed after lumbar fusion and a region-specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI) is necessary. Methods. We examined the differences in postoperative functional disability between 81 patients who underwent >= 3-level lumbar fusion (group I) and 70 age- and sex-matched patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusion (group II). The ODI and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were assessed pre- and postoperatively. The SFDI was assessed after lumbar fusion. We evaluated intergroup differences in postoperative VAS, ODI, and SFDI scores during 3-year follow-up. Each mean score was evaluated separately for the 10 ODI and the 12 SFDI items, and we evaluated the changes observed in these scores over the 3-year follow-up. Results. The mean intergroup preoperative ODI and VAS scores were similar. The mean postoperative intergroup VAS scores were similar; however, the mean postoperative ODI and SFDI scores were significantly higher in group I than in group II at 1-year (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively) and 3-year follow-up (P = 0.037, P<0.001, respectively). Among 10 ODI items, group I showed significant disability with regard to six items at the 1-year follow-up compared with group II, but only showed significant disability with regard to one item at the 3-year follow-up. Among the 12 SFDI items, group I showed significant disability with regard to all 12 items at 1-year follow-up compared with group II, as well as significant disability with regard to nine items at 3-year follow-up. Conclusion. The SFDI is more sensitive than the ODI in assessing functional disabilities based on the levels of fusion. Most SFDI items indicated continued significant disability in patients with long-level lumbar fusion even 3 years postoperatively.
机译:学习规划。回顾性案例控制研究。客观的。在短期和长级别腰椎融合后评估特定的功能障碍。背景数据摘要。 Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)不能代表腰椎融合后观察到的所有类型的功能障碍,并且需要特定于特定的功能残疾指数(SFDI)。方法。我们检查了81例患者术后术后功能性残疾的差异> = 3级腰椎融合(Ⅰ组)和70名和性匹配患者,他们接受了一次或两级腰椎融合(II级)。在术后和术后评估ODI和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。 SFDI在腰椎融合后评估。在3年的随访期间,我们评估了术后VAS,ODI和SFDI评估的互动差异。每个平均得分是单独评估的10个ODI和12个SFDI项目,我们在3年的随访中评估了这些分数中观察到的变化。结果。平均杂项术前odi和vas得分类似。平均术后跨组VAS得分类似;然而,I型术后ODI和SFDI评分在1年的II组中显着较高(P <0.001,P <0.001分别)和3年随访(P = 0.037,P <0.001,分别)。在10个ODI项目中,与II组相比,我在六个项目方面表现出六个项目的重大残疾,但只表现出3年随访的一个项目的重大残疾。在12项SFDI项目中,与II组相比,我对所有12件物品进行了大量残疾,以及第三次,在3年的后续行动方面的九件物品有重大残疾。结论。根据融合水平评估功能障碍时,SFDI更敏感。大多数SFDI项目表明术后3年患者长期腰椎融合的患者持续显着残疾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号