...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Microbiology: An International Journal >Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates: comparative evaluation of disk-diffusion and E-test methods
【24h】

Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates: comparative evaluation of disk-diffusion and E-test methods

机译:幽门螺杆菌临床分离株的药敏性:磁盘扩散和电子测试方法的比较评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Antimicrobial susceptibility of 25 Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from patients with acid peptic diseases were tested for in vitro sensitivity to commonly used antibiotics using disk-diffusion and E-test, methods. All strains tested were susceptible to tetracycline by E-test, with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values being <0.125 microg/ml for all strains except for 6 (<0.023 microg/ml). However 1 strain was resistant by disk-diffusion method. One strain was resistant to clarithromycin both by disk diffusion and E-test (MIC <48 microg/ml), and 1 strain was resistant only by disk diffusion. Only one strain was resistant to amoxicillin by disk diffusion and E-test (MIC >256 microg/ml). For ciprofloxacin, three strains were resistant by disk diffusion and two by E-test (MIC <32 microg/ml). Sixteen strains were resistant to metronidazole by disk diffusion and E-test (MIC >or= 8 microg/ml), and 1 was resistant only by E-test (MIC <48 microg/ml). Overall, 64% of the strains were resistant to metronidazole. The MIC for metronidazole was also tested by agar-dilution method, and metronidazole resistant strains had an, MIC >8 microg/ml. The disk-diffusion method showed excellent correlation with E-test results; there was 100% agreement for amoxicillin a other antibiotics showed 90% to 95% accuracy. Disk diffusion is cheaper than E-test (approximately 2.6 cents vs. 2.60 US dollars), is easy to perform, and is a reliable method for testing H. pylori susceptibility to antimicrobial agents in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
机译:使用圆盘扩散法和E-test方法对从酸性消化性疾病患者中分离出的25株幽门螺杆菌菌株的抗菌敏感性进行了体外敏感性测试。通过E-test,所有测试的菌株均对四环素敏感,除6个菌株(<0.023 microg / ml)外,所有菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值均<0.125 microg / ml。然而,有1个菌株通过圆盘扩散法具有抗性。通过盘扩散和E-测试(MIC <48 microg / ml),一株对克拉霉素都具有抗性,而仅盘扩散对一株具有克拉霉素。通过盘扩散和E-检验(MIC> 256 microg / ml),仅一种菌株对阿莫西林具有抗性。对于环丙沙星,三株菌株通过圆盘扩散耐药,两株通过E检验(MIC <32 microg / ml)。通过盘扩散和E-测试(MIC>或= 8 microg / ml),有16个菌株对甲硝唑具有抗性,仅通过E-test(MIC <48 microg / ml),有1个菌株具有抗性。总体而言,64%的菌株对甲硝唑具有抗性。还通过琼脂稀释法测试了甲硝唑的MIC,抗甲硝唑的菌株的MIC> 8 microg / ml。圆盘扩散法与电子测试结果显示出极好的相关性;有100%同意使用阿莫西林,其他抗生素显示90%至95%的准确性。磁盘扩散比E检验便宜(约2.6美分对2.60美元),易于执行,并且是在临床微生物学实验室中测试幽门螺杆菌对抗菌剂敏感性的可靠方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号