首页> 外文期刊>Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA >Efficacy and safety of elcatonin in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of elcatonin in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

机译:骨质疏松症绝经后妇女的Elcatonin的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The present systematic review aimed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) change and complication rates of elcatonin on treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. The result confirmed efficacy of elcatonin and safety in combination therapies of elcatonin (C-E). Introduction Postmenopausal osteoporosis is an important issue in global aging trends. One treatment of osteoporosis is elcatonin, a kind of calcitonin. However, it has been challenged for long time because of safety. Many trials investigated on this topic, but they were designed differently. Those designs can be categorized in monotherapy of elcatonin (M-E) and C-E. Unfortunately, no synthesized evidence dealt this topic. Methods This study systematically identified target trials from six important databases and only included randomized controlled trial for synthesis. Two investigators assessed quality of eligible trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and they independently extracted data. Network meta-analysis performed Peto odds ratio (POR, used for dealing with zero cell) or weighted mean difference (WMD, for continuous data) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and consistency H. Results Sixteen trials recruiting 2754 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were included in our study. Elcatonin therapies and non-elcatonin medications had comparable fracture rates and bone mineral density change. Yet, C-E (WMD, - 18.93; 95% CI, - 23.97 to - 13.89) and M-E (WMD, - 13.72; 95% CI, - 19.51 to - 7.94) had significantly lower pain score than non-elcatonin medications. However, M-E (POR = 8.413, 95% CI, 2.031 to 34.859) and non-elcatonin medication (Peto OR, 7.450; 95% CI, 1.479 to 37.530) had significantly higher complication rates than placebo. No evidence detected inconsistency and small study effect in this network model. Conclusions Based on current evidence, C-E may be considered for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis because it benefits on pain relief and complications. Moreover, it shows comparable fracture rate and bone mineral density change as compared with anti-osteoporosis and calcium supplements. Nevertheless, further trials are needed to investigate formula and dosages of elcatonin.
机译:本系统评价的目的是评估在治疗绝经后骨质疏松依降钙素的骨矿物质密度(BMD)的变化和并发症发生率。结果证实在联合疗法依降钙素的(C-E)依降钙素和安全性的功效。引言绝经后骨质疏松是全球老龄化趋势的一个重要问题。骨质疏松症的一个治疗是依降钙素,一种降钙素。然而,它已经挑战了很长一段时间,因为安全的。许多试验研究了这个话题,但他们的目的是不同的。这些设计可以在依降钙素(M-E)和C-E的单一疗法进行分类。不幸的是,没有证据合成处理这个问题。方法:本研究系统地从六个重要的数据库确定目标测试,只包括随机对照合成试验。两位研究者评估使用偏置工具的科克伦风险合格试验的质量,和他们独立提取数据。网络荟萃分析的95%置信区间(CI)和一致性H.结果进行皮托比值比(POR,用于处理零细胞)或加权平均差异(WMD,用于连续数据)16个临床试验招募2754名妇女绝经后骨质疏松包括在我们的研究中。依降钙素疗法和非依降钙素药物具有相当的骨折率和骨矿物质密度的变化。然而,C-E(WMD, - 18.93; 95%CI, - 23.97至 - 13.89)和M-E(WMD, - 13.72; 95%CI, - 19.51至 - 7.94)具有显著下部疼痛评分比非依降钙素药物。然而,M-E(POR = 8.413; 95%CI,2.031至34.859)和非依降钙素药物(皮托OR,7.450; 95%CI,1.479至37.530)具有更高显著并发症发生率比安慰剂。没有证据检测出不一致,小学习效果在这个网络模型。根据现有的证据结论,C-E可以被认为是用于治疗绝经后骨质疏松,因为它在缓解疼痛和并发症的好处。此外,它显示了与抗骨质疏松症和钙补充剂相比可比较的骨折率和骨矿物质密度的变化。然而,还需要进一步的试验研究配方和依降钙素的剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号