...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Potential value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile stool toxin using enzyme immunoassay?
【24h】

Potential value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile stool toxin using enzyme immunoassay?

机译:使用酶免疫法重复检测粪便对艰难梭菌粪便毒素的潜在价值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this brief review is to summarize the literature as it relates to the potential value of repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) toxin using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxin A&B and also propose a potential newer algorithm for diagnosing C. difficile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two investigators conducted independent literature searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until May 1st, 2010. All databases were searched using the terms Clostridium difficile, CDAD, antibiotic associated diarrhea, C. difficile in combination with enzyme immunoassay, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, Clostridium difficile toxin A, Clostridium difficile toxin B, Clostridium difficile toxin and repeat stool testing. Articles which discussed EIA in C. difficile infection (CDI) patients were reviewed and relevant cross references also read and evaluated for inclusion. Selection bias could be a possible limitation of the approach used in selecting or finding articles for this article. FINDINGS: The evidence for repeat stool testing for C. difficile toxin detection using toxin EIA is becoming weaker. Most recent published practice guidelines recommend a two- or three-step testing algorithm for the detection of C. difficile. CONCLUSIONS: EIA for C. difficile stool toxin has a limited sensitivity, but, it does not warrant repeat stool testing. The data for this are suggestive but not conclusive. More studies and better tests are needed to have clear guidelines which can specify the number of tests needed in a diagnostic workup of suspected C. difficile infection. A two-step or three-step method in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea offered a marked increase in sensitivity compared to that of toxin A&B EIA alone.
机译:目的:本简要综述的目的是对文献进行总结,因为它涉及使用酶免疫法(EIA)对毒素A&B进行艰难梭菌毒素重复粪便检测的潜在价值,并提出了一种潜在的较新算法用于诊断艰难梭菌。研究设计与方法:直到2010年5月1日,两名研究人员使用PubMed,Web of Science和Scopus进行了独立的文献检索。所有数据库均使用艰难梭菌,CDAD,抗生素相关性腹泻,艰难梭菌和酶免疫法联合检索。 ,酶联免疫吸附测定,艰难梭菌毒素A,艰难梭菌毒素B,艰难梭菌毒素和重复大便测试。评论了讨论艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者的EIA的文章,并阅读和评估了相关的交叉引用以评估其纳入。选择偏差可能是对本文选择或查找文章所用方法的一种可能限制。结果:使用毒素EIA进行艰难梭菌毒素重复粪便检测的证据越来越少。最新发布的实践指南建议使用两步或三步测试算法来检测艰难梭菌。结论:艰难梭菌粪便毒素的EIA灵敏度有限,但不能重复进行粪便测试。此数据具有启发性,但不是决定性的。需要更多的研究和更好的测试来获得明确的指南,这些指南可以指定疑似艰难梭菌感染诊断检查中所需的测试数量。与仅使用毒素A&B EIA相比,诊断艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的两步或三步方法可显着提高敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号