...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Comparative analysis of the top six and bottom six teams? corner kick strategies in the 2015/2016 English Premier League
【24h】

Comparative analysis of the top six and bottom six teams? corner kick strategies in the 2015/2016 English Premier League

机译:比较分析前六个和六支球队的比较分析? 2015/2016英国英超联赛中的角球踢战略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compared the corner kick strategies employed by the top six and bottom six teams across 120 matches of the 2015/2016 English Premier League Season. In total, 2,303 corner kicks were examined by univariate analyses (individual ?(2)) and bivariate analyses with contingency tables (?(2) and association measures). Top six teams favoured an outswinging delivery, whilst the bottom six teams favoured inswinging deliveries (p < 0.001). Top six teams operated a dynamic attacking organisation during ball deliveries (p < 0.001), whereas the bottom six operated static and dynamic attacking strategies in equal measure. Top six teams took corner kicks frequently when winning or drawing, whereas bottom six teams took most corner kicks when losing or drawing (match status, p < 0.001). Bivariate analyses identified that goals were scored from corner kicks when attacking organisation was dynamic, two defenders were on the posts and the score line was level (p < 0.05). Results supplement the design of practice tasks that afford successful corner kicks in training and game play scenarios.
机译:本研究比较了2015/2016英超联赛季节120个比赛的前六个和六个团队所采用的角球反军策略。共有2,303个角踢,通过单变量分析(个人?(2))和与应急表(?(2)和关联措施的双变量分析)。前六支球队赞成搬运,六支球队有利于inswinging交付(p <0.001)。前六支球队在球交付期间操作了动态攻击组织(P <0.001),而底部六个操作静态和动态攻击策略等措施。前六支球队在获胜或绘画时经常踢角球,而六支球队在失去或绘制时大多数踢球(匹配状态,P <0.001)。相生分析确定,当攻击组织是动态时,从角踢得分,两名后卫在帖子上,得分线是水平(P <0.05)。结果补充了实践任务的设计,负担成功的角落踢在培训和游戏场景中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号