首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >A review of glucosamine for knee osteoarthritis: why patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate should be differentiated from other glucosamines to maximize clinical outcomes
【24h】

A review of glucosamine for knee osteoarthritis: why patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate should be differentiated from other glucosamines to maximize clinical outcomes

机译:氨基葡萄糖治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的综述:为何应将专利结晶硫酸葡萄糖胺与其他葡萄糖胺区分开来最大程度地提高临床疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) treatment algorithm for knee osteoarthritis (OA) recommends symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs) first line for the medium to long term management of OA, due to their ability to control pain, improve function, and delay joint structural changes. Among SYSADOAs, glucosamine is probably the most widely used intervention. In the present review of glucosamine for knee OA, we have investigated whether the evidence is greater for the patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate (pCGS) preparation (Rottapharm/Meda) than for other glucosamine formulations. Glucosamine is actually widely available in many forms, as the prescription-grade pCGS preparation, generic and over-the-counter formulations of glucosamine sulfate (GS) and food supplements containing glucosamine hydrochloride (GH), which vary substantially in molecular form, pharmaceutical formulation and dose regimens. Only pCGS is given as a highly bioavailable once daily dose (1500mg) with a proven pharmacological effect. pCGS consistently reaches the plasma levels of around 10 mu M required to inhibit interleukin-1 induced expression of genes involved in the pathophysiology of joint inflammation and tissue destruction, compared with sub-therapeutic levels achieved with GH. It is evident, from careful consideration of the evidence base, that only the pCGS formulation of glucosamine reliably provides an effect size on pain that is higher than that of paracetamol and equivalent to that provided by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. In comparison, the effect size on pain of non-crystalline GS preparations and GH from randomized controlled trials is repeatedly demonstrated to be zero. In addition, there is evidence that chronic administration of pCGS has disease-modifying effects, with a reduction in the need for total joint replacement surgery lasting for at least 5 years after treatment cessation. Consequently, the pCGS preparation (Rottapharm/Meda) is the logical choice, with demonstrated medium-term control of pain and lasting impact on disease progression.
机译:针对骨关节炎(OA)的欧洲骨质疏松症和骨关节炎临床和经济方面(ESCEO)治疗算法,由于其能力,建议对骨关节炎(OA)中长期治疗使用有症状的慢效药物(SYSADOAs)一线控制疼痛,改善功能并延缓关节结构变化。在SYSADOA中,氨基葡萄糖可能是使用最广泛的干预措施。在目前针对膝骨关节炎的葡萄糖胺的综述中,我们调查了专利结晶硫酸葡萄糖胺(pCGS)制剂(Rottapharm / Meda)的证据是否比其他葡萄糖胺制剂更大。葡萄糖胺实际上可以多种形式广泛使用,例如处方级的pCGS制剂,硫酸葡萄糖胺(GS)的通用和非处方制剂以及含有葡萄糖胺盐酸盐(GH)的食品添加剂,它们的分子形式,药物配方都存在很大差异和剂量方案。仅pCGS以高生物利用度给予,每日一次剂量(1500mg)具有已证实的药理作用。与GH的亚治疗水平相比,pCGS始终达到抑制白细胞介素1诱导的与关节炎症和组织破坏的病理生理学有关的基因表达的水平所需的约10μM血浆水平。从仔细考虑的证据来看,很明显只有葡糖胺的pCGS制剂才能可靠地提供比对乙酰氨基酚更大的疼痛效果,并且与非甾体类抗炎药相当。相比之下,来自随机对照试验的非结晶GS制剂和GH对疼痛的影响大小被反复证明为零。此外,有证据表明,长期服用pCGS具有改善疾病的作用,在治疗停止后至少需要持续5年的全关节置换手术的需求减少。因此,pCGS制剂(Rottapharm / Meda)是合乎逻辑的选择,具有对疼痛的中期控制和对疾病进展的持久影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号