首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ceftriaxone administered with or without recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) versus intravenous ceftriaxone administration in adult volunteers
【24h】

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ceftriaxone administered with or without recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) versus intravenous ceftriaxone administration in adult volunteers

机译:与成人静脉注射头孢曲松钠相比,皮下注射头孢曲松钠或不注射重组人透明质酸酶(rHuPH20)的安全性和药代动力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous (SC) ceftriaxone administration versus SC ceftriaxone preceded by SC saline placebo or intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone administration. Research design and methods: This Phase I, two-part, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 54 healthy volunteers. In Part 1 (N24), subjects received 1mL rHuPH20 (150 USP units) or placebo (0.9 sodium chloride) SC, followed by 1 or 2g ceftriaxone (10350mg/mL). In Part 2 (N30), subjects received 1g ceftriaxone at the Part 1 maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) administered either SC preceded by SC rHuPH20 or placebo or IV. Subjects were monitored for adverse events (AEs); blood samples were obtained (Part 2 only) during 48 hours post-dosing for ceftriaxone bioanalysis. Main outcome measures: Part 1 primary endpoint was the SC ceftriaxone (with or without rHuPH20) MTC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in Part 2. Bioequivalence was based on maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under plasma concentrationtime curve (AUC). Results: The highest SC ceftriaxone concentration tested in Part 1 (350mg/mL) was selected as the Part 2 MTC. In Part 2, median time to maximum concentration (tmax) was 1 hour earlier (P0.0001), and Cmax was 12 higher (P0.0001) for ceftriaxone (350mg/mL) administered via rHuPH20-facilitated SC versus SC preceded by placebo. IV ceftriaxone led to higher Cmax and shorter tmax values than either SC treatment. Ceftriaxone exposure (AUC) was comparable among all three treatments. At least 1 AE was experienced by 100 of subjects after SC ceftriaxone and 76 after IV; most commonly reported AEs were infusion-site reactions. Conclusions: Ceftriaxone AUC did not differ significantly between the three administration routes. Cmax was higher and tmax shorter with rHuPH20-facilitated SC than SC preceded by placebo. rHuPH20-facilitated SC ceftriaxone was generally well tolerated. This study is limited by evaluation of healthy adults and absence of repeated-dose groups.
机译:目的:比较重组人透明质酸酶(rHuPH20)促进皮下(SC)头孢曲松钠与SC头孢曲松钠(先于SC盐水安慰剂或静脉内(IV)头孢曲松钠)的药代动力学和安全性。研究设计和方法:这项第一阶段,分为两部分,安慰剂对照的交叉研究在54位健康志愿者中进行。在第1部分(N24)中,受试者接受1mL rHuPH20(150 USP单位)或安慰剂(0.9氯化钠)SC,然后接受1或2g头孢曲松(10350mg / mL)。在第2部分(N30)中,受试者接受1g头孢曲松酮治疗,先以SC rHuPH20或安慰剂或IV给药,然后服用SC第1部分最大耐受浓度(MTC)。监测受试者的不良事件(AE);给药后48小时内采集血样(仅限第2部分)用于头孢曲松生物分析。主要结局指标:第1部分主要终点是SC头孢曲松(有或没有rHuPH20)MTC。在第2部分中确定了药代动力学参数。生物等效性基于最大浓度(Cmax)和血浆浓度时间曲线下的面积(AUC)。结果:将第1部分中测试的最高SC头孢曲松浓度(350mg / mL)选择为第2部分MTC。在第2部分中,通过rHuPH20促进的SC与安慰剂之前的SC相比,头孢曲松(350mg / mL)的最大浓度中值时间(tmax)提前了1小时(P <0.0001),Cmax升高了12(P <0.0001)。 。与任一SC治疗相比,IV头孢曲松导致更高的Cmax和更短的tmax值。头孢曲松暴露(AUC)在所有三种治疗中均相当。头孢曲松钠治疗后100名受试者和静脉注射后76名受试者经历了至少1次AE。最常见的不良事件是输注部位反应。结论:头孢曲松AUC在三种给药途径之间没有显着差异。 rHuPH20促进的SC的Cmax高于安慰剂之前的SC,而tmax较短。通常,rHuPH20促进的SC头孢曲松耐受性良好。这项研究受到健康成年人的评估和无重复剂量组的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号