首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Failure mode and effects analysis of linac‐based liver stereotactic body radiotherapy
【24h】

Failure mode and effects analysis of linac‐based liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

机译:基于LINAC的肝脏立体定向体放射疗法的失效模式及其效果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose Although stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an attractive noninvasive approach for liver irradiation, it presents specific challenges associated with respiration‐induced liver motion, daily tumor localization due to liver deformation, and poor visualization of target with respect to adjacent normal liver in computed tomography (CT). We aim to identify potential hazards and develop a set of mitigation strategies to improve the safety of our liver SBRT program, using failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). Materials and methods A multidisciplinary group consisting of two physicians, three physicists, two dosimetrists, and two therapists was formed. A process map covering ten major stages of the liver SBRT program from the initial diagnosis to posttreatment follow‐up was generated. A total of 102 failure modes (FM), together with their causes and effects, were identified. The occurrence (O), severity (S), and lack of detectability (D) were independently scored using a scale from 1 (lowest risk) to 10 (largest risk). The ranking was done using the risk probability number (RPN) defined as the product of average O, S, and D numbers for each mode. Two fault tree analyses were performed. The failure modes with the highest RPN values as well as highest severity score were considered for investigation and a set of mitigation strategies was developed to address these. Results The median RPN (RPN med ) values for all modes ranged from of 9 to 105 and the highest median S score (S med ) was 8. Fourteen FMs were identified to be significant by both RPN med and S med (top ten RPN med ranked and highest S med FMs) and 12 of them were considered for risk mitigation efforts. The remaining two were omitted due to either sufficient checks already in place, or lack of practical mitigation strategies. Implemented measures consisted of five physics tasks, two physician tasks, and three workflow changes. Conclusions The application of FMEA to our liver SBRT program led to the identification of potential FMs and allowed improvement measures to enhance the safety of our clinical practice.
机译:目的虽然立体定位体放射治疗(SBRT)是一种吸引人的肝脏照射的非侵入性方法,但它呈现出与呼吸诱导的肝运动相关的特定挑战,由于肝脏变形,每日肿瘤定位,以及靶相对于相邻的正常肝脏的差异差计算断层扫描(CT)。我们的目标是识别潜在的危险,并制定一系列缓解策略,以利用故障模式和效果分析(FMEA)来改善肝脏SBRT程序的安全性。材料和方法形成了由两个医生,三位物理学家,两种剂量分子和两个治疗师组成的多学科组。生成了覆盖肝脏SBRT程序十个主要阶段的过程地图,从初步诊断到后处理后续行动。还确定了总共102种故障模式(FM)以及它们的原因和效果。发生(o),严重程度和缺乏可检测性(D),使用从1(最低风险)到10(最大风险)的规模独立评分。使用作为每种模式的平均O,S和D号的乘积定义的风险概率数(RPN)进行排名。执行两个故障树分析。考虑有最高RPN值的失败模式以及最高严重程度得分进行调查,并制定了一系列缓解策略来解决这些问题。结果所有模式的中位数RPN(RPN MED)值范围为9至105,最高中位数S分数(S MED)是8. RPN MED和S MED(十大RPN MED被认为是风险缓解努力的排名和最高的SMIC FMS)和12个。由于已经采用了足够的检查或缺乏实际缓解策略,剩下的两个是省略的。实施的措施包括五个物理任务,两个医生任务,以及三个工作流程变化。结论FMEA在我们的肝脏SBRT计划中的应用导致潜在的FMS识别,允许改进措施,提高临床实践的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号