首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Combining uncertainty with uncertainty to get certainty? Efficiency analysis for regulation purposes
【24h】

Combining uncertainty with uncertainty to get certainty? Efficiency analysis for regulation purposes

机译:结合不确定性的不确定性以确定肯定吗? 规范目的效率分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), as well as combinations thereof, are widely applied in incentive regulation practice, where the assessment of efficiency plays a major role in regulation design and benchmarking. Using a Monte Carlo simulation experiment, this paper compares the performance of six alternative methods commonly applied by regulators. Our results demonstrate that combination approaches, such as taking the maximum or the mean over DEA and SFA efficiency scores, have certain practical merits and might offer a useful alternative to strict reliance on a singular method. In particular, the results highlight that taking the maximum not only minimizes the risk of underestimation, but can also improve the precision of efficiency estimation. Based on our results, we give recommendations for the estimation of individual efficiencies for regulation purposes and beyond. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:数据包络分析(DEA)和随机前沿分析(SFA)以及其组合广泛应用于激励调节实践,效率评估在规范设计和基准中起着重要作用。 本文采用了蒙特卡罗仿真实验,比较了六种替代方法常用的稳压器的性能。 我们的结果表明,组合方法,如采取最大值或平均值,以及SFA效率得分,具有一定的实际优点,可能提供严格依赖奇异方法的有用替代方案。 特别是,结果突出显示最大值,不仅最大限度地减少了低估的风险,而且还可以提高效率估计的精度。 根据我们的结果,我们提出建议估计各个效率的监管目的及更远。 (c)2018年elestvier b.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号