首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Economic assessment of conventional and conservation tillage practices in different wheat-based cropping systems of Punjab, Pakistan
【24h】

Economic assessment of conventional and conservation tillage practices in different wheat-based cropping systems of Punjab, Pakistan

机译:巴基斯坦不同小麦种植体系中常规和保护耕作实践的经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Wheat productivity and profitability is low under conventional tillage systems as they increase the production cost, soil compaction, and the weed infestation. Conservation tillage could be a pragmatic option to sustain the wheat productivity and enhance the profitability on long term basis. This study was aimed to evaluate the economics of different wheat-based cropping systems viz. fallow-wheat, rice-wheat, cotton-wheat, mung bean-wheat, and sorghum-wheat, with zero tillage, conventional tillage, deep tillage, bed sowing (60/30 cm beds and four rows), and bed sowing (90/45 cm beds and six rows). Results indicated that the bed sown wheat had the maximum production cost than other tillage systems. Although both bed sowing treatments incurred the highest production cost, they generated the highest net benefits and benefit: cost ratio (BCR). Rice-wheat cropping system with bed sown wheat (90/45 cm beds with six rows) had the highest net income (4129.7 US$ ha(-1)), BCR (2.87), and marginal rate of return compared with rest of the cropping systems. In contrast, fallow-wheat cropping system incurred the lowest input cost, but had the least economic return. In crux, rice-wheat cropping system with bed sown wheat (90/45 cm beds with six rows) was the best option for getting the higher economic returns. Moreover, double cropping systems within a year are more profitable than sole planting of wheat under all tillage practices.
机译:在传统的耕作系统下,小麦生产力和盈利能力在增加生产成本,土壤压实和杂草侵犯时低。保护耕作可能是维持小麦生产力并长期提高盈利能力的务实选择。本研究旨在评估不同小麦种植系统的经济学。休耕小麦,米饭,棉质小麦,绿豆小麦和高粱小麦,零耕作,常规耕作,深耕,床播种(60/30厘米床和四排),床播种(90 / 45厘米床和六排)。结果表明,床播种小麦的产量最高比其他耕作系统。虽然两张床播种治疗都产生了最高的生产成本,但它们产生了最高的净效益和利益:成本比(BCR)。带床播种小麦的米饭种植系统(90/45厘米的六排)净收入最高(4129.7美元(-1)),BCR(2.87),与其他剩余的返回率的边际率裁剪系统。相比之下,休耕小麦种植系统产生最低的投入成本,但经济回报率最低。在Crux中,米饭种植系统与床播种小麦(90/45厘米的六排)是获得更高经济回报的最佳选择。此外,一年内的双重种植系统比在所有耕作实践下的小麦种植更有利可图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号