首页> 外文学位 >AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS IN THE SOUTHEAST SAGINAW BAY COASTAL DRAINAGE BASIN (MICHIGAN)
【24h】

AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS IN THE SOUTHEAST SAGINAW BAY COASTAL DRAINAGE BASIN (MICHIGAN)

机译:萨吉纳夫湾东南沿海流域(密歇根州)传统耕作和保护性耕作制度的经济比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is concern over the quality of Michigan lakes and waterways, and over decreasing soil productivity due to the loss of top soil as a result of water and wind erosion. This concern has prompted the Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP), a USDA agency, to promote, through cost share programs, conservation tillage practices that are known to reduce erosion and the associated pollution. Voluntary adoption, however, is uncertain because of the lack of knowledge of the economic impacts of such practices on farmers. Therefore, this study was initiated to make comparative economic analysis of the conservation tillage systems being encouraged to the tillage practices traditionally used in the Southeast Saginaw Bay Watershed area.;Cooperating farmers were asked to set aside a parcel of land (2 to 4 hectares) and to prepare half of it with a normal method of tillage and the other half using conservation tillage equipment like the regular or modified chisel plow. Data on machinery management, agronomic requirements and crop performance were collected from these side-by-side plots.;Results of the first two years of a three year study show that conservation tillage performed as well or better than conventional tillage in most areas. No increase in pesticides use was required due to conservation tillage. Seed moisture at harvest was not significantly different between the two types of systems. Soil moisture was available to plants for a longer period in conservation tilled plots. There was no statistically discernible difference in yield between systems in 1980. In the 1981 season differences were statistically discernable between individual plots due to abnormal weather patterns.;A machinery selection model was developed to analyze machinery requirements for different tillage systems. The model was used to determine the optimum size machinery for conservation and conventional tillage based upon performance and economic criteria.;Only input/output items that differ across both systems were considered. Partial budgeting techniques were used to evaluate the economics of conservation tillage systems relative to conventional systems. Results for different crop sequences on different farm sizes depict that conservation tillage can always provide a lower cost of producing the same crop or crop sequence.
机译:人们担心密歇根州湖泊和水道的质量,以及由于水和风蚀导致表层土壤流失而导致土壤生产力下降。这种担忧促使美国农业部的农业保护计划(ACP)通过成本分摊计划促进了已知的减少耕作和减少污染及相关污染的耕作实践。但是,由于缺乏对这种做法对农民的经济影响的了解,因此自愿采用尚不确定。因此,开始这项研究是为了对保护性耕作系统进行比较经济分析,以鼓励对萨吉诺湾东南流域地区传统上使用的耕作方法进行保护;要求合作农民留出一块土地(2至4公顷)并用常规耕作方法准备一半,另一半使用保护性耕作设备(例如常规或改良的凿子犁)进行准备。从这些并排的地块收集了有关机械管理,农艺要求和农作物性能的数据。一项为期三年的研究的前两年的结果表明,在大多数地区,保护性耕作的表现与传统耕作相同或更好。由于保护性耕作,不需要增加农药使用量。两种系统在收获时的种子水分没有显着差异。在耕作保护区,土壤水分可以长期供植物利用。在1980年之间,系统之间的产量没有统计学上的可辨别差异。在1981年季节,由于异常的天气模式,各个地块之间的差异在统计学上是可辨别的。该模型用于根据性能和经济标准确定用于保护和传统耕作的最佳尺寸机械。仅考虑两个系统之间不同的投入/产出项目。使用部分预算技术来评估保护性耕作系统相对于传统系统的经济性。不同农场规模上不同作物序列的结果表明,保护性耕作总是可以提供较低的生产相同作物或作物序列的成本。

著录项

  • 作者

    MUHTAR, HANNIBAL A.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Agricultural engineering.;Agricultural economics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 344 p.
  • 总页数 344
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号