> Extrapolation formulas based on power and exponential formulas, as well as alternatives from a Taylor series, were tested and used with density'/> Assessment of a composite method based on selected density functional theory methods and complete basis set extrapolation formulas
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Quantum Chemistry >Assessment of a composite method based on selected density functional theory methods and complete basis set extrapolation formulas
【24h】

Assessment of a composite method based on selected density functional theory methods and complete basis set extrapolation formulas

机译:基于所选密度函数理论方法的复合方法评估及完整基础设定外推式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

> Extrapolation formulas based on power and exponential formulas, as well as alternatives from a Taylor series, were tested and used with density functional theory (DFT) for the calculation of enthalpies of formation. The following four functionals were analyzed: B3LYP, BMK, M06‐2X, and B2PLYP. Preliminary tests pointed to B2PLYP and B3LYP as the best and worst functionals, respectively. Taylor series expressions were as accurate as the power formulas and presented better performance than the exponential equation. The power formula (Equation (2)) and one of the simplest Taylor expressions (Equation (13)) were selected for the calculations with B3LYP and B2PLYP, with further empirical adjustments based on the higher level correction (HLC) and scaling of the experimental atomization energies used to calculate enthalpies of formation. HLC improved the B3LYP mean absolute error (MAE) from approximately 4.3 to 3.5 kcal?mol ?1 using both extrapolation alternatives. For B2PLY, the MAEs were improved from 2.7 to 2.6 kcal?mol ?1 . Regarding the G3/05 test set, a significant improvement in the MAEs around 2.5 and 1.5 kcal?mol ?1 were achieved using B3LYP and B2PLYP, respectively. The accuracy obtained from these empirical corrections was equivalent to other composite methods. The MAEs from B3LYP and B2PLYP may be suggested as ranges for the possible accuracy to be achieved by some DFT methods. The empirical corrections suggested in this work are improvements that may be considered to provide acceptable accuracy for enthalpies of formation and possibly other properties.
机译:

基于电源和指数公式的外推式,以及泰勒序列的替代品进行了测试,并用于计算的密度泛函理论(DFT)形成焓。分析以下四个功能:B3LYP,BMK,M06-2X和B2PLYP。初步测试指向B2PLYP和B3LYP分别为最佳和最糟糕的功能。泰勒系列表达式与动力公式一样准确,并且比指数方程更好地表现。选择电源公式(等式(2))和最简单的泰勒表达式(等式(13)),用于使用B3LYP和B2PLYP计算,具有基于更高水平校正(HLC)和实验的缩放的越来的经验调整用于计算地层焓的雾化能量。 HLC使用外推替代品改善了大约4.3至3.5kcal的B3Lyp平均绝对误差(MAE)从大约4.3到3.5千卡(3.5千卡)。对于B2ply,MAE从2.7到2.6 kcal提高到2.6 kcal?mol 1 。关于G3 / 05试验组,使用B3LYP和B2PLYP实现了2.5%和1.5千卡的MAES左右约为2.5和1.5kcal的显着改善。从这些经验校正获得的精度相当于其他复合方法。来自B3LYP和B2PLYP的MAE可以被建议为可以通过一些DFT方法实现的可能精度的范围。在本作工作中提出的经验校正是可以考虑的改进,以便为形成和可能的其他性质提供可接受的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号