...
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology >Minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.
【24h】

Minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.

机译:微创妇科手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate different surgical options for the treatment of endometriomas. A heated debate is currently under way between advocates of excisional surgery and the ablative approach. With papers increasingly focusing on ovarian reserve after endometrioma surgery, a review was mandatory. RECENT FINDINGS: Excisional and ablative surgery are well known procedures. This paper describes a combined technique that allows preservation of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. The question of postoperative ovarian reserve is widely discussed and the risk of malignancy is addressed. SUMMARY: Some previously published reviews have probably too hastily concluded that excision is a better option than ablation. They failed to analyze the ovarian reserve, which is often significantly decreased after excisional surgery.This manuscript clearly explains the crucial importance of preserving the ovarian blood supply, as well as the ovarian cortex containing all primordial follicles, during surgery.
机译:审查目的:评估子宫内膜瘤的不同手术选择。切除外科手术的倡导者与消融方法之间的争论目前正在进行中。随着子宫内膜瘤手术后越来越多的论文关注卵巢储备,必须进行审查。最近的发现:切除和消融手术是众所周知的程序。本文介绍了一种可以保留卵巢体积和窦卵泡计数的组合技术。广泛讨论了术后卵巢储备的问题,并解决了恶性肿瘤的风险。摘要:一些以前发表的评论可能太仓促得出结论,切除比消融是更好的选择。他们没有分析卵巢切除手术后通常显着减少的卵巢储备量。该手稿清楚地说明了在手术过程中保持卵巢血供以及包含所有原始卵泡的卵巢皮质的至关重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号