...
首页> 外文期刊>Culture, Agriculture, Food & Environment >Reflections on Teaching an 'Anthropology of Energy'
【24h】

Reflections on Teaching an 'Anthropology of Energy'

机译:关于“能源人类学”教学的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

If "energy needs anthropology," as Harold Wilhite (2005) argues, the discipline is rising to meet this challenge with a small but growing surge of ethnographic research attending to questions of power and difference in patterns of energy extraction, distribution, and consumption. For many anthropologists working in this vein—in particular, those of us influenced by science and technology studies—energy infrastructure, existing and imagined, demands attention as a mediating device for emerging cultural politics surrounding questions of sustainable development (SD), justice, and what constitutes a good life (see, e.g., Hess 2007; Johnston 2007; Masco 2006; Nader 2010; Paladino and Simonelli 2012; Strauss etal. 2013; Winther 2008). Indeed, ethnographic attention to energy development, from coal to solar, has the power to illuminate the diverse stakes behind the stakes: that is, the ethical commitments, political visions, desires, and identities that are invested in, and worked out through, materialtransformations of landscapes and their constitutive, human-to-nonhuman engagements.
机译:如Harold Wilhite(2005)所说,如果“能源需要人类学”,那么该学科将通过少量但不断增长的民族志研究来应对这一挑战,这些民族志研究涉及功率以及能量提取,分配和消耗方式的差异。对于许多从事这一工作的人类学家,尤其是我们这些受科学和技术研究影响的人类学家而言,现有的和想象中的能源基础设施需要引起关注,以作为围绕可持续发展(SD),正义和政治问题的新兴文化政治的中介工具。怎样才能构成好生活(例如,参见Hess 2007; Johnston 2007; Masco 2006; Nader 2010; Paladino and Simonelli 2012; Strauss等人2013; Winther 2008)。确实,人种学对从煤炭到太阳能的能源发展的关注,有能力阐明各种利益背后的各种利益:即,通过物质转化进行投资并制定出来的道德承诺,政治愿景,愿望和身份景观及其构成性的,人与非人类的互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号