...
首页> 外文期刊>Current HIV research >Opiate Addiction Therapies and HIV-1 Tat: Interactive Effects on Glial [Ca2+](i), Oxyradical and Neuroinflammatory Chemokine Production and Correlative Neurotoxicity
【24h】

Opiate Addiction Therapies and HIV-1 Tat: Interactive Effects on Glial [Ca2+](i), Oxyradical and Neuroinflammatory Chemokine Production and Correlative Neurotoxicity

机译:阿片类药物成瘾疗法和HIV-1 Tat:对神经胶质[Ca2 +](i),氧自由基和神经炎症趋化因子产生及相关神经毒性的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Few preclinical studies have compared the relative therapeutic efficacy of medications used to treat opiate addiction in relation to neuroAIDS. Here we compare the ability of methadone and buprenorphine, and the prototypic opiate morphine, to potentiate the neurotoxic and proinflammatory ([Ca2+](i), ROS, H2O2, chemokines) effects of HIV-1 Tat in neuronal and/or mixedglial co-cultures. Repeated observations of neurons during 48 h exposure to combinations of Tat, equimolar concentrations (500 nM) of morphine, methadone, or buprenorphine exacerbated neurotoxicity significantly above levels seen with Tat alone. Buprenorphine alone displayed marked neurotoxicity at 500 nM, prompting additional studies of its neurotoxic effects at 5 nM and 50 nM concentrations +/- Tat. In combination with Tat, buprenorphine displayed paradoxical, concentration-dependent, neurotoxic and neuroprotective actions. Buprenorphine neurotoxicity coincided with marked elevations in [Ca2+](i), but not increases in glial ROS or chemokine release. Tat by itself elevated the production of CCL5/RANTES, CCL4/MIP-1 beta, and CCL2/MCP-1. Methadone and buprenorphine alone had no effect, but methadone interacted with Tat to further increase production of CCL5/RANTES. In combination with Tat, all drugs significantly increased glial [Ca2+](i), but ROS was only significantly increased by co-exposure with morphine. Taken together, the increases in glial [Ca2+](i), ROS, and neuroinflammatory chemokines were not especially accurate predictors of neurotoxicity. Despite similarities, opiates displayed differences in their neurotoxic and neuroinflammatory interactions with Tat. Buprenorphine, in particular, was partially neuroprotective at a low concentration, which may result from its unique pharmacological profile at multiple opioid receptors. Overall, the results reveal differences among addiction medications that may impact neuroAIDS.
机译:很少有临床前研究比较过与神经艾滋病有关的用于治疗阿片成瘾的药物的相对治疗功效。在这里,我们比较了美沙酮和丁丙诺啡以及原型鸦片吗啡增强神经元和/或混合神经胶质联合HIV-1的神经毒性和促炎([Ca2 +](i),ROS,H2O2,趋化因子)作用的能力。文化。在接触Tat,等摩尔浓度(500 nM)吗啡,美沙酮或丁丙诺啡的组合后48小时内,对神经元的反复观察使神经毒性加剧,明显高于单独使用Tat时的水平。单独的丁丙诺啡在500 nM时显示出明显的神经毒性,促使对其在5 nM和50 nM浓度+/- Tat时的神经毒性作用进行进一步研究。与Tat组合使用时,丁丙诺啡具有悖论性,浓度依赖性,神经毒性和神经保护作用。丁丙诺啡的神经毒性与[Ca2 +](i)明显升高同时出现,但神经胶质ROS或趋化因子释放并未增加。 Tat本身提高了CCL5 / RANTES,CCL4 / MIP-1 beta和CCL2 / MCP-1的产生。单独使用美沙酮和丁丙诺啡没有作用,但美沙酮与Tat相互作用进一步提高了CCL5 / RANTES的产量。与Tat联合使用时,所有药物均显着增加神经胶质[Ca2 +](i),但仅与吗啡共同暴露才显着增加ROS。总体而言,神经胶质[Ca2 +](i),ROS和神经炎性趋化因子的增加并不是神经毒性的特别准确的预测指标。尽管有相似之处,但阿片类药物在与Tat的神经毒性和神经炎性相互作用中显示出差异。特别是丁丙诺啡在低浓度时具有部分神经保护作用,这可能是由于其在多种阿片受体上的独特药理作用所致。总体而言,结果表明可能影响神经艾滋病的成瘾药物之间存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号