...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Comparison of capillary electrophoresis and capillary liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry for the analysis of transthyretin in human serum
【24h】

Comparison of capillary electrophoresis and capillary liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry for the analysis of transthyretin in human serum

机译:毛细管电泳与毛细管液相色谱-质谱联用对人血清中运甲状腺素蛋白分析的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Capillary electrophoresis and capillary liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS and CapLC-MS, respectively) are nowadays very suitable techniques for the separation and characterization of intact proteins in biological fluids. In this paper, we compare the performance of both techniques for the analysis of transthyretin (TTR), which is a homotetrameric protein (relative molecular mass (M-r) similar to 56,000) involved in different types of amyloidosis. Furthermore, it is also presented a novel sample pretreatment based on immunoprecipitation (IP) using Protein A Ultrarapid Agarose (TM) (UAPA) magnetic beads (MBs) to purify TTR from serum samples. This novel IP based on MBs allowed the detection of TTR monomeric proteoforms that were not possible to analyze by conventional IP in solution. In addition, UAPA MBs provided many other desirable advantages including higher selectivity and minimal unspecific binding of other proteins. CE-MS and CapLC-MS were applied to analyze serum samples from healthy controls and familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy type I (FAP-I) patients, who suffered from the most common hereditary systemic amyloidosis. Both techniques allowed detecting the same TTR proteoforms, including the mutant TTR (Met 30) variant (variation in relative molecular mass (Delta M-r) was +32.07, from wild-type TTR). Migration/retention times and relative quantitation of the different proteoforms were similar and reproducible in both cases, but the limits of detection (LOD5) achieved by CE-MS were slightly lower (2-2.5-fold). Some other differences were also found on separation selectivity (migration orders and separation of antibody), peak efficiency, total analysis time, calibration ranges and experimental M-r accuracy. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:如今,毛细管电泳和毛细管液相色谱与质谱联用(分别为CE-MS和CapLC-MS)是用于分离和表征生物流体中完整蛋白的非常合适的技术。在本文中,我们比较了两种技术对运甲状腺素蛋白(TTR)的分析性能,运甲状腺素蛋白是一种涉及不同类型淀粉样变性的同四聚体蛋白(相对分子质量(M-r)类似于56,000)。此外,还提出了一种基于免疫沉淀(IP)的新型样品预处理方法,该方法使用蛋白A超快速琼脂糖(TM)(UAPA)磁珠(MBs)从血清样品中纯化TTR。这种基于MB的新型IP可以检测TTR单体蛋白形式,而传统的IP在溶液中无法分析。另外,UAPA MB提供了许多其他所需的优点,包括更高的选择性和与其他蛋白质的最小非特异性结合。 CE-MS和CapLC-MS用于分析来自健康对照组和I型家族性淀粉样变性多发性神经病(FAP-1)患者的血清样品,这些患者患有最常见的遗传性系统性淀粉样变性病。两种技术都允许检测相同的TTR蛋白形式,包括突变的TTR(Met 30)变体(相对分子质量(Delta M-r)的变异为+32.07,来自野生型TTR)。在两种情况下,不同蛋白形式的迁移/保留时间和相对定量均相似且可重现,但CE-MS的检测限(LOD5)略低(2-2.5倍)。在分离选择性(迁移顺序和抗体分离),峰效率,总分析时间,校准范围和实验M-r准确性上也发现了一些其他差异。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号