...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >A comparison between emulsification of reverse micelle-based supramolecular solvent and solidification of vesicle-based supramolecular solvent for the microextraction of triazines
【24h】

A comparison between emulsification of reverse micelle-based supramolecular solvent and solidification of vesicle-based supramolecular solvent for the microextraction of triazines

机译:反向胶束型超分子溶剂的乳化与囊泡型超分子溶剂的固化对三嗪微萃取的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two approaches based on emulsification of reverse micelle-based supramolecular solvent microextraction (ERM-SSME) and solidification of vesicle-based supramolecular solvent microextraction (SV-SSME) were compared for the extraction and preconcentration of four triazines (cyanazine, simazine, prometon and propazine) from water samples. Different ERM-SSME and SV-SSME parameters influencing the extraction efficiency were studied and optimized. The results showed that both extraction methods exhibited good linearity, precision, enrichment factor, and detection limit. Under optimal conditions, the limits of detection were 0.3 and 0.5 μgL~(-1) for ERM-SSME and SV-SSME, respectively. The enrichment factors were from 330 to 505 and 285 to 421 for ERM-SSME and SV-SSME, respectively. The applicability of the proposed methods was examined by analyzing triazines in water samples and good results were obtained.
机译:比较了两种基于反胶束的超分子溶剂微萃取(ERM-SSME)的乳化和基于囊泡的超分子溶剂微萃取(SV-SSME)固化的两种方法对四种三嗪(氰嗪,辛嗪,普罗姆通和丙嗪)的萃取和预浓缩。 )从水样中提取。研究和优化了不同的ERM-SSME和SV-SSME参数对提取效率的影响。结果表明,两种提取方法均具有良好的线性,精密度,富集因子和检测限。在最佳条件下,ERM-SSME和SV-SSME的检出限分别为0.3和0.5μgL〜(-1)。 ERM-SSME和SV-SSME的富集因子分别为330至505和285至421。通过分析水样中的三嗪类化合物,检验了所提方法的适用性,取得了良好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号