首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Tobacco assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Program Clinical Trials
【24h】

Tobacco assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Program Clinical Trials

机译:积极参与国家癌症研究所合作小组计划临床试验的烟草评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Substantial evidence suggests that tobacco use has adverse effects on cancer treatment outcomes; however, routine assessment of tobacco use has not been fully incorporated into standard clinical oncology practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tobacco use assessment in patients enrolled onto actively accruing cancer clinical trials. Methods: Protocols and forms for 155 actively accruing trials in the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Program were evaluated for tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up by using a structured coding instrument. Results: Of the 155 clinical trials reviewed, 45 (29%) assessed any form of tobacco use at enrollment, but only 34 (21.9%) assessed current cigarette use. Only seven trials (4.5%) assessed any form of tobacco use during follow-up. Secondhand smoke exposure was captured in 2.6% of trials at enrollment and 0.6% during follow-up. None of the trials assessed nicotine dependence or interest in quitting at any point during enrollment or treatment. Tobacco status assessment was higher in lung/head and neck trials as well as phase III trials, but there was no difference according to year of starting accrual or cooperative group. Conclusion: Most actively accruing cooperative group clinical trials do not assess tobacco use, and there is no observable trend in improvement over the past 8 years. Failure to incorporate standardized tobacco assessments into NCI-funded Cooperative Group Clinical Trials will limit the ability to provide evidence-based cessation support and will limit the ability to accurately understand the precise effect of tobacco use on cancer treatment outcomes.
机译:目的:大量证据表明吸烟对癌症治疗结果有不利影响;但是,对烟草使用的常规评估尚未完全纳入标准的临床肿瘤学实践中。这项研究的目的是评估积极参加癌症临床试验的患者的烟草使用评估。方法:在美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)临床试验合作小组计划中,对155项主动累积试验的方案和表格进行了评估,以纳入和随访时使用结构化编码工具进行烟草使用评估。结果:在所审查的155个临床试验中,有45个(29%)评估了入选时的任何形式的烟草使用,但是只有34个(21.9%)评估了当前的香烟使用。只有七项试验(4.5%)评估了随访期间任何形式的烟草使用。入组时有2.6%的试验记录了二手烟暴露,而随访期间则为0.6%。在纳入或治疗期间的任何时候,没有一项试验评估尼古丁的依赖性或戒烟的兴趣。在肺/头颈试验以及III期试验中,烟草状态评估较高,但根据开始应计制或合作组的年份,烟草状态评估没有差异。结论:最活跃的合作组临床试验并未评估烟草使用,并且在过去8年中没有明显的改善趋势。未能将标准化的烟草评估纳入NCI资助的合作组临床试验中将限制提供循证戒烟支持的能力,并且将限制准确了解烟草使用对癌症治疗结果的确切影响的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号