...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial.
【24h】

Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial.

机译:NSABP B-38试验比较了可手术的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌妇女的三种化疗方案的III期辅助试验的最终结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anthracycline- and taxane-based three-drug chemotherapy regimens have proven benefit as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. This trial (NSABP B-38; Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women Who Have Undergone Surgery for Node-Positive Breast Cancer) asked whether the incorporation of a fourth drug could improve outcomes relative to two standard regimens and provided a direct comparison of those two regimens.We randomly assigned 4,894 women with node-positive early-stage breast cancer to six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC), four cycles of dose-dense (DD) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of DD paclitaxel (P; DD AC→P), or DD AC→P with four cycles of gemcitabine (G) added to the DD paclitaxel (DD AC→PG). Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was required; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were used at the investigator's discretion.There were no significant differences in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between DD AC→PG and DD AC→P (80.6% v 82.2%; HR, 1.07; P = .41), between DD AC→PG and TAC (80.6% v 80.1%; HR, 0.93; P = .39), in 5-year overall survival (OS) between DD AC→PG and DD AC→P (90.8% v 89.1%; HR, 0.85; P = .13), between DD AC→PG and TAC (90.8% v 89.6%; HR, 0.86; P = .17), or between DD AC→P versus TAC for DFS (HR, 0.87; P = .07) and OS (HR, 1.01; P = .96). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities for TAC, DD AC→P, and DD AC→PG, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (9%, 3%, 3%; P < .001), sensory neuropathy (< 1%, 7%, 6%; P < .001), and diarrhea (7%, 2%, 2%; P < .001). Exploratory analyses for ESAs showed no association with DFS events (HR, 1.02; P = .95).Adding G to DD AC→P did not improve outcomes. No significant differences in efficacy were identified between DD AC→P and TAC, although toxicity profiles differed.
机译:基于蒽环类和紫杉烷类的三药化疗方案已被证明可作为早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗方法。该试验(NSABP B-38;联合化学疗法治疗接受淋巴结阳性乳腺癌手术的妇女)询问,相对于两种标准方案,并用第四种药物是否可以改善预后,并直接比较了这两种方案。我们将4894名患有淋巴结阳性的早期乳腺癌妇女随机分配到6个周期的多西他赛,阿霉素和环磷酰胺(TAC),4个剂量密集(DD)的阿霉素和环磷酰胺周期和4个DD紫杉醇周期(P; DD AC→P)或DD AC→P,将四个吉西他滨(G)循环添加到DD紫杉醇中(DD AC→PG)。需要初级粒细胞集落刺激因子的支持;研究者可酌情使用促红细胞生成素(ESA).DD AC→PG和DD AC→P的5年无病生存期(DFS)差异无统计学意义(80.6%v 82.2%; HR,1.07 ; P = 0.41),介于DD AC→PG和DD AC→P之间的5年总生存期(OS)之间(80.6%v 80.1%; HR,0.93; P = 0.39) (90.8%v 89.1%; HR,0.85; P = .13),介于DD AC→PG和TAC之间(90.8%v 89.6%; HR,0.86; P = .17),或DD AC→P与TAC之间DFS(HR,0.87; P = .07)和OS(HR,1.01; P = 0.96)。 TAC,DD AC→P和DD AC→PG的3至4级毒性分别为发热性中性粒细胞减少症(9%,3%,3%; P <.001),感觉神经病(<1%,7%, 6%; P <.001)和腹泻(7%,2%,2%; P <.001)。对ESAs的探索性分析显示与DFS事件无关联(HR,1.02; P = 0.95)。在DD AC→P中添加G并不能改善结局。尽管毒性特征不同,但在DD AC→P和TAC之间没有发现功效的显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号